The Aristocracy of the Long Robe : The Origins of Judicial Review in America. Este artículo no está disponible.
Idioma: inglés
Editorial: Bloomsbury 3PL, 1989
- Tapa dura
- Usado

Librería: Buchpark, Trebbin, AlemaniaBuchpark
Vendedor de IberLibro desde 30 de septiembre de 2021
Condición: Usado - Excelente
Precio actual: EUR 80,22
Descripción del artículo del vendedor
Zustand: Sehr gut | Seiten: 376 | Sprache: Englisch | Produktart: Bücher | Is judicial review constitutionally required or even authorized? Can it be said whether the federal courts exercise this power with the consent of the electorate? Sosin addresses these challenging questions in the broad context of the Anglo-American historical experience. He examines the evolution of courts of judicature and legislatures and the contests for power that were waged from the seventeenth to eighteenth century.The origins of the English court system and the establishment of common law are first described. The author traces the rise in judicial and parliamentary power that occurred with the erosion of the royal prerogative and discusses the constitutional and legal heritage that provided the framework for law, courts, and legislatures in colonial America. Following an examination of political, legislative, and legal development during the colonial period, Sosin looks at the philosophical and ideological controversies that influenced the framing of the Constitution, particulary the conflicting views of the proper relationship between the legislature and judiciary. Despite the emphatic opposition voiced by some framers to giving judges the power to overturn legislative action by ruling on the constitutionality of federal laws, the Supreme Court was able to declare itself the final arbiter and ultimate interpreter of the Constitution as early as the first decade of the nineteenth century. The author's analysis indicates that the Court's assumption of the power of judicial review was neither inevitable politically nor the logical result of the founders desire to limit government and protect the rights of individuals against interferences by public authority. Echoing early English and American political figures, Sosin asks whether this expanded, arbitrary judicial power can be considered appropriate in a representative democracy. The product of meticulous research and careful historical analysis, this provocative study will be relevant reading for a variety of courses in American government, political science, and history.…
N° de ref. del artículo 1965195/2
- Título
- The Aristocracy of the Long Robe : The Origins of Judicial Review in America
- Autor
- Jack M. Sosin, J. M. Sosin
- Editorial
- Bloomsbury 3PL
- Año de publicación
- 1989
- Estado
- Sehr gut
- Encuadernación
- Encuadernación de tapa dura
- Idioma
- inglés
- ISBN 10
- 0313267332
- ISBN 13
- 9780313267338
- Catálogos de vendedores
- Bücher
Is judicial review constitutionally required or even authorized? Can it be said whether the federal courts exercise this power with the consent of the electorate? Sosin addresses these challenging questions in the broad context of the Anglo-American historical experience. He examines the evolution of courts of judicature and legislatures and the contests for power that were waged from the seventeenth to eighteenth century.
The origins of the English court system and the establishment of common law are first described. The author traces the rise in judicial and parliamentary power that occurred with the erosion of the royal prerogative and discusses the constitutional and legal heritage that provided the framework for law, courts, and legislatures in colonial America. Following an examination of political, legislative, and legal development during the colonial period, Sosin looks at the philosophical and ideological controversies that influenced the framing of the Constitution, particulary the conflicting views of the proper relationship between the legislature and judiciary. Despite the emphatic opposition voiced by some framers to giving judges the power to overturn legislative action by ruling on the constitutionality of federal laws, the Supreme Court was able to declare itself the final arbiter and ultimate interpreter of the Constitution as early as the first decade of the nineteenth century. The author's analysis indicates that the Court's assumption of the power of judicial review was neither inevitable politically nor the logical result of the founders desire to limit government and protect the rights of individuals against interferences by public authority. Echoing early English and American political figures, Sosin asks whether this expanded, arbitrary judicial power can be considered appropriate in a representative democracy. The product of meticulous research and careful historical analysis, this provocative study will be relevant reading for a variety of courses in American government, political science, and history.
“Sinopsis” puede pertenecer a otra edición de este título.
Acerca del autor
J.M. SOSIN is a History Professor at the University of Nebraska, Lincoln. He is the author of several books dealing with the American Revolution and the administrative and political history of the English empire in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries.
“Acerca de” puede pertenecer a otra edición de este título.