Anyone Who Has a View: Theoretical Contributions to the Study of Argumentation - Tapa blanda

Sinopsis

Preface. 1. Reasons; R.C. Pinto. 2. The pragmatic dimension of premise acceptability; J.B. Freeman. 3. Rationality and judgment; H. Siegel. 4. The dialectical tier revisited; R.H. Johnson. 5. The rabbit in the hat: the internal relations of the pragma-dialectical rules; H.V. Hansen. 6. Toumlin's warrants; D. Hitchcock. 7. Metadialogues; E.C.W. Krabbe. 8. Relationships among logic, dialectic and rhetoric; J.A. Blair. 9. Logical fallacies, dialectical transgressions, rhetorical sins and other failures of rationality in argumentation; D.H. Cohen. 10. A pragmatic view of the burden of proof; F.H. van Eemeren, P. Houtlosser. 11. The ordinary practice of presuming and presumption with special attention to veracity and the burden of proof; F.J. Kauffeld. 12. Two conceptions of openness in argumentation theory; S. Jacobs. 13. Multidimensionality and non-deductiveness in deliberate argumentation; C. Kock. 14. Argumentation studies in France: a new legitimacy; C. Plantin. 15. Discourse correspondence between argumentative and grammatical sequences; S. Stati. 16. Diagramming, argumentation schemes and critical questions; D. Walton, C. Reed. 17. Legal argumentation theory and the concept of law; S. Bertea. 18. Arguer's obligations: another perspective; J.W. Wenzel. 19. Charles S. Pierce's theory of abduction and the Aristotelian enthymeme from signs; M. Kraus. 20. Rhetoric and dialectic in Martin Luther King's 'Letter from Birmingham Jail'; M. Leff. 21. On the argumentative quality of explanatory narratives; T. Kvernbekk. 22. The wiles of argument: protodeliberation and heroic prudence in Homer's `Odyssey'; G.T. Goodnight. 23. Felicity conditions for the circumstantial ad hominem: the case of `Bush v. Gore'; D. Zarefsky. 24. The potential conflict between normatively-good argumentative practice and persuasive success: evidence from persuasion effects research; D.J. O'Keefe. 25. The concept of argument quality in the elaboraton likelihood model: a normative and empirical approach to Petty and Cacioppo's `strong' and `weak' arguments; R. van Enschot-van Dijk, L. Hustinx, H. Hoeken. 26. How narrative argumentation works: an analysis of argumentation aimed at reconsidering goals; L. Langsdorf. List of contributors.

"Sinopsis" puede pertenecer a otra edición de este libro.