Artículos relacionados a A lexicalist account of argument structure
Sinopsis
There are two prominent schools in linguistics: Minimalism (Chomsky) and Construction Grammar (Goldberg, Tomasello). Minimalism comes with the claim that our linguistic capabilities consist of an abstract, binary combinatorial operation (Merge) and a lexicon. Most versions of Construction Grammar assume that language consists of flat phrasal schemata that contribute their own meaning and may license additional arguments. This book examines a variant of Lexical Functional Grammar, which is lexical in principle but was augmented by tools that allow for the description of phrasal constructions in the Construction Grammar sense. These new tools include templates that can be used to model inheritance hierarchies and a resource driven semantics. The resource driven semantics makes it possible to reach the effects that lexical rules had, for example remapping of arguments, by semantic means. The semantic constraints can be evaluated in the syntactic component, which is basically similar to the delayed execution of lexical rules. So this is a new formalization that might be suitable to provide solutions to longstanding problems that are not available for other formalizations. While the authors suggest a lexical treatment of many phenomena and only assume phrasal constructions for selected phenomena like benefactive and resultative constructions in English, it can be shown that even these two constructions should not be treated phrasally in English and that the analysis would not extend to other languages as for instance German. I show that the new formal tools do not really improve the situation and many of the basic conceptual problems remain. Since this specific proposal fails for two constructions, it follows that proposals (in the same framework) that assume phrasal analyses for all constructions are not appropriate either. The conclusion is that lexical models are needed and this entails that the schemata that combine syntactic objects are rather abstract (as in Catego
"Sinopsis" puede pertenecer a otra edición de este libro.
- EditorialLanguage Science Press
- Año de publicación2018
- ISBN 10 3961101221
- ISBN 13 9783961101221
- EncuadernaciónTapa dura
- IdiomaInglés
- Número de páginas104
- Contacto del fabricanteno disponible
Comprar nuevo
Ver este artículo
EUR 25,21
EUR 0,83 gastos de envío desde Estados Unidos de America a España
Destinos, gastos y plazos de envíoResultados de la búsqueda para A lexicalist account of argument structure
Imagen de archivo
A lexicalist account of argument structure
Publicado por
Language Science Press, 2018
ISBN 10: 3961101221
ISBN 13: 9783961101221
Antiguo o usado
Tapa dura
Librería: Buchpark, Trebbin, Alemania
Calificación del vendedor: 5 de 5 estrellas
Condición: Sehr gut. Zustand: Sehr gut | Seiten: 104 | Sprache: Englisch | Produktart: Bücher. Nº de ref. del artículo: 33095077/2
Cantidad disponible: 1 disponibles
Imagen de archivo
A lexicalist account of argument structure
Publicado por
Language Science Press, 2018
ISBN 10: 3961101221
ISBN 13: 9783961101221
Nuevo
Tapa dura
Librería: PBShop.store US, Wood Dale, IL, Estados Unidos de America
Calificación del vendedor: 5 de 5 estrellas
HRD. Condición: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000. Nº de ref. del artículo: L1-9783961101221
Cantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles
Imagen de archivo
A lexicalist account of argument structure
Publicado por
Language Science Press, 2018
ISBN 10: 3961101221
ISBN 13: 9783961101221
Nuevo
Tapa dura
Librería: PBShop.store UK, Fairford, GLOS, Reino Unido
Calificación del vendedor: 4 de 5 estrellas
HRD. Condición: New. New Book. Delivered from our UK warehouse in 4 to 14 business days. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000. Nº de ref. del artículo: L1-9783961101221
Cantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles
Imagen de archivo
A lexicalist account of argument structure
Publicado por
Language Science Press, 2018
ISBN 10: 3961101221
ISBN 13: 9783961101221
Nuevo
Tapa dura
Librería: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Reino Unido
Calificación del vendedor: 5 de 5 estrellas
Condición: New. In. Nº de ref. del artículo: ria9783961101221_new
Cantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles
Imagen del vendedor
A lexicalist account of argument structure
Publicado por
Language Science Press, 2018
ISBN 10: 3961101221
ISBN 13: 9783961101221
Nuevo
Tapa dura
Librería: BuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K., Bergisch Gladbach, Alemania
Calificación del vendedor: 5 de 5 estrellas
Buch. Condición: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -There are two prominent schools in linguistics: Minimalism (Chomsky) and Construction Grammar (Goldberg, Tomasello). Minimalism comes with the claim that our linguistic capabilities consist of an abstract, binary combinatorial operation (Merge) and a lexicon. Most versions of Construction Grammar assume that language consists of flat phrasal schemata that contribute their own meaning and may license additional arguments. This book examines a variant of Lexical Functional Grammar, which is lexical in principle but was augmented by tools that allow for the description of phrasal constructions in the Construction Grammar sense. These new tools include templates that can be used to model inheritance hierarchies and a resource driven semantics. The resource driven semantics makes it possible to reach the effects that lexical rules had, for example remapping of arguments, by semantic means. The semantic constraints can be evaluated in the syntactic component, which is basically similar to the delayed execution of lexical rules. So this is a new formalization that might be suitable to provide solutions to longstanding problems that are not available for other formalizations. While the authors suggest a lexical treatment of many phenomena and only assume phrasal constructions for selected phenomena like benefactive and resultative constructions in English, it can be shown that even these two constructions should not be treated phrasally in English and that the analysis would not extend to other languages as for instance German. I show that the new formal tools do not really improve the situation and many of the basic conceptual problems remain. Since this specific proposal fails for two constructions, it follows that proposals (in the same framework) that assume phrasal analyses for all constructions are not appropriate either. The conclusion is that lexical models are needed and this entails that the schemata that combine syntactic objects are rather abstract (as in Categorial Grammar, Minimalism, HPSG and standard LFG). On the other hand there are constructions that should be treated by very specific, phrasal schemata as in Construction Grammar and LFG and HPSG. So the conclusion is that both schools are right (and wrong) and that a combination of ideas from both camps is needed. 104 pp. Englisch. Nº de ref. del artículo: 9783961101221
Cantidad disponible: 2 disponibles
Imagen del vendedor
A lexicalist account of argument structure
Publicado por
Language Science Press, 2018
ISBN 10: 3961101221
ISBN 13: 9783961101221
Nuevo
Tapa dura
Librería: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Alemania
Calificación del vendedor: 5 de 5 estrellas
Buch. Condición: Neu. nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware - Printed after ordering - There are two prominent schools in linguistics: Minimalism (Chomsky) and Construction Grammar (Goldberg, Tomasello). Minimalism comes with the claim that our linguistic capabilities consist of an abstract, binary combinatorial operation (Merge) and a lexicon. Most versions of Construction Grammar assume that language consists of flat phrasal schemata that contribute their own meaning and may license additional arguments. This book examines a variant of Lexical Functional Grammar, which is lexical in principle but was augmented by tools that allow for the description of phrasal constructions in the Construction Grammar sense. These new tools include templates that can be used to model inheritance hierarchies and a resource driven semantics. The resource driven semantics makes it possible to reach the effects that lexical rules had, for example remapping of arguments, by semantic means. The semantic constraints can be evaluated in the syntactic component, which is basically similar to the delayed execution of lexical rules. So this is a new formalization that might be suitable to provide solutions to longstanding problems that are not available for other formalizations. While the authors suggest a lexical treatment of many phenomena and only assume phrasal constructions for selected phenomena like benefactive and resultative constructions in English, it can be shown that even these two constructions should not be treated phrasally in English and that the analysis would not extend to other languages as for instance German. I show that the new formal tools do not really improve the situation and many of the basic conceptual problems remain. Since this specific proposal fails for two constructions, it follows that proposals (in the same framework) that assume phrasal analyses for all constructions are not appropriate either. The conclusion is that lexical models are needed and this entails that the schemata that combine syntactic objects are rather abstract (as in Categorial Grammar, Minimalism, HPSG and standard LFG). On the other hand there are constructions that should be treated by very specific, phrasal schemata as in Construction Grammar and LFG and HPSG. So the conclusion is that both schools are right (and wrong) and that a combination of ideas from both camps is needed. Nº de ref. del artículo: 9783961101221
Cantidad disponible: 1 disponibles
Imagen de archivo
A lexicalist account of argument structure
Publicado por
Language Science Press, 2018
ISBN 10: 3961101221
ISBN 13: 9783961101221
Nuevo
Tapa dura
Librería: California Books, Miami, FL, Estados Unidos de America
Calificación del vendedor: 5 de 5 estrellas
Condición: New. Nº de ref. del artículo: I-9783961101221
Cantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles
Imagen del vendedor
A lexicalist account of argument structure (Hardback or Cased Book)
Publicado por
Language Science Press 10/18/2018, 2018
ISBN 10: 3961101221
ISBN 13: 9783961101221
Nuevo
Tapa dura
Librería: BargainBookStores, Grand Rapids, MI, Estados Unidos de America
Calificación del vendedor: 5 de 5 estrellas
Hardback or Cased Book. Condición: New. A lexicalist account of argument structure 0.82. Book. Nº de ref. del artículo: BBS-9783961101221
Cantidad disponible: 5 disponibles
Imagen del vendedor
A lexicalist account of argument structure
Publicado por
Language Science Press, 2018
ISBN 10: 3961101221
ISBN 13: 9783961101221
Nuevo
Tapa dura
Librería: moluna, Greven, Alemania
Calificación del vendedor: 5 de 5 estrellas
Condición: New. Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. Über den AutorrnrnStefan Mueller studied Computer Science, Computational Linguistics and Linguistics at the Humboldt University at Berlin and in Edinburgh. He worked at the German Research Center of Artificial Intelligence (DFKI) in Saarbruec. Nº de ref. del artículo: 449808815
Cantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles
Imagen del vendedor
A lexicalist account of argument structure
Publicado por
Language Science Press, Language Science Press Okt 2018, 2018
ISBN 10: 3961101221
ISBN 13: 9783961101221
Nuevo
Tapa dura
Librería: buchversandmimpf2000, Emtmannsberg, BAYE, Alemania
Calificación del vendedor: 5 de 5 estrellas
Buch. Condición: Neu. Neuware -There are two prominent schools in linguistics: Minimalism (Chomsky) and Construction Grammar (Goldberg, Tomasello). Minimalism comes with the claim that our linguistic capabilities consist of an abstract, binary combinatorial operation (Merge) and a lexicon. Most versions of Construction Grammar assume that language consists of flat phrasal schemata that contribute their own meaning and may license additional arguments. This book examines a variant of Lexical Functional Grammar, which is lexical in principle but was augmented by tools that allow for the description of phrasal constructions in the Construction Grammar sense. These new tools include templates that can be used to model inheritance hierarchies and a resource driven semantics. The resource driven semantics makes it possible to reach the effects that lexical rules had, for example remapping of arguments, by semantic means. The semantic constraints can be evaluated in the syntactic component, which is basically similar to the delayed execution of lexical rules. So this is a new formalization that might be suitable to provide solutions to longstanding problems that are not available for other formalizations. While the authors suggest a lexical treatment of many phenomena and only assume phrasal constructions for selected phenomena like benefactive and resultative constructions in English, it can be shown that even these two constructions should not be treated phrasally in English and that the analysis would not extend to other languages as for instance German. I show that the new formal tools do not really improve the situation and many of the basic conceptual problems remain. Since this specific proposal fails for two constructions, it follows that proposals (in the same framework) that assume phrasal analyses for all constructions are not appropriate either. The conclusion is that lexical models are needed and this entails that the schemata that combine syntactic objects are rather abstract (as in Categorial Grammar, Minimalism, HPSG and standard LFG). On the other hand there are constructions that should be treated by very specific, phrasal schemata as in Construction Grammar and LFG and HPSG. So the conclusion is that both schools are right (and wrong) and that a combination of ideas from both camps is needed.Books on Demand GmbH, Überseering 33, 22297 Hamburg 104 pp. Englisch. Nº de ref. del artículo: 9783961101221
Cantidad disponible: 2 disponibles