Seminar paper from the year 2009 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: European Union, grade: A-, University of Basel (Europainstitut), language: English, abstract: Authors have proved hypothesis: Turkey's military capabilities, experience in NATO and international peace keeping operations and missions could rather strengthen than weaken ESDP position. However, there are some weaknesses that Turkey faces (focus on 'hard' rather than 'soft' power, military is in the process of modernizing, underestimated role in peace keeping operations), Turkey's contribution to ESDP is too significant (strong involvement in the missions) and will give more benefits than costs. Furthermore, Turkish accession to the EU would transform strategic challenges of ESDP.51 Only five of twenty ESDP peace keeping operations have been of a military nature, which mostly has been held by NATO or UN. "When it comes to much bigger military issues, the EU avoids taking strategic responsibility and still depends on the NATO to do its 'dirty work'"52. Therefore military stronger EU would give NATO and UN credit that EU is also responsible in the field of crisis management. Such win-win situation would exempt US Secretary's of State Madeleine Albright's the "3 D's": 1) decoupling of ESDP from NATO, 2) duplication of capabilities, 3) discrimination of non-EU NATO members.53 Turkey would also play role of agent between EU and NATO and "parties involved will benefit from threelevel game"54 (EU-Turkey-NATO). Therefore it is advantageous and beneficial not only for Turkey, but also for the EU and the NATO as well.55 Finally, last week Enlargement Commissioner Olli Rehn once more showed that EU would not allow Turkey 'cruise control' on accession.56 Therefore Turkey-EU relations should balance the contributions and benefits of such partnership and show that both partners can be producers and consumers of security and experience of defence. Such dialogue will prove that EU can play an imp
"Sinopsis" puede pertenecer a otra edición de este libro.
Seminar paper from the year 2009 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: European Union, grade: A-, University of Basel (Europainstitut), language: English, abstract: Authors have proved hypothesis: Turkey's military capabilities, experience in NATO and international peace keeping operations and missions could rather strengthen than weaken ESDP position. However, there are some weaknesses that Turkey faces (focus on 'hard' rather than 'soft' power, military is in the process of modernizing, underestimated role in peace keeping operations), Turkey's contribution to ESDP is too significant (strong involvement in the missions) and will give more benefits than costs. Furthermore, Turkish accession to the EU would transform strategic challenges of ESDP.51 Only five of twenty ESDP peace keeping operations have been of a military nature, which mostly has been held by NATO or UN. "When it comes to much bigger military issues, the EU avoids taking strategic responsibility and still depends on the NATO to do its 'dirty work'"52. Therefore military stronger EU would give NATO and UN credit that EU is also responsible in the field of crisis management. Such win-win situation would exempt US Secretary's of State Madeleine Albright's the "3 D's": 1) decoupling of ESDP from NATO, 2) duplication of capabilities, 3) discrimination of non-EU NATO members.53 Turkey would also play role of agent between EU and NATO and "parties involved will benefit from threelevel game"54 (EU-Turkey-NATO). Therefore it is advantageous and beneficial not only for Turkey, but also for the EU and the NATO as well.55 Finally, last week Enlargement Commissioner Olli Rehn once more showed that EU would not allow Turkey 'cruise control' on accession.56 Therefore Turkey-EU relations should balance the contributions and benefits of such partnership and show that both partners can be producers and consumers of security and experience of defence. Such dialogue will prove that EU can play an imp
"Sobre este título" puede pertenecer a otra edición de este libro.
Librería: BuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K., Bergisch Gladbach, Alemania
Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -Seminar paper from the year 2009 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: European Union, grade: A-, University of Basel (Europainstitut), language: English, abstract: Authors have proved hypothesis: Turkey's military capabilities, experience in NATO andinternational peace keeping operations and missions could rather strengthen than weakenESDP position. However, there are some weaknesses that Turkey faces (focus on 'hard'rather than 'soft' power, military is in the process of modernizing, underestimated role inpeace keeping operations), Turkey's contribution to ESDP is too significant (stronginvolvement in the missions) and will give more benefits than costs. Furthermore, Turkishaccession to the EU would transform strategic challenges of ESDP.51Only five of twenty ESDP peace keeping operations have been of a military nature, whichmostly has been held by NATO or UN. 'When it comes to much bigger military issues, theEU avoids taking strategic responsibility and still depends on the NATO to do its 'dirtywork''52. Therefore military stronger EU would give NATO and UN credit that EU is alsoresponsible in the field of crisis management. Such win-win situation would exempt USSecretary's of State Madeleine Albright's the '3 D's': 1) decoupling of ESDP from NATO,2) duplication of capabilities, 3) discrimination of non-EU NATO members.53 Turkey wouldalso play role of agent between EU and NATO and 'parties involved will benefit from threelevelgame'54 (EU-Turkey-NATO). Therefore it is advantageous and beneficial not only forTurkey, but also for the EU and the NATO as well.55Finally, last week Enlargement Commissioner Olli Rehn once more showed that EU wouldnot allow Turkey 'cruise control' on accession.56 Therefore Turkey-EU relations shouldbalance the contributions and benefits of such partnership and show that both partners can beproducers and consumers of security and experience of defence. Such dialogue will prove thatEU can play an important role in CFSP/ESDP dimension also in the future. 24 pp. Englisch. Nº de ref. del artículo: 9783640872091
Cantidad disponible: 2 disponibles
Librería: buchversandmimpf2000, Emtmannsberg, BAYE, Alemania
Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. Neuware -Seminar paper from the year 2009 in the subject Politics - Topic: European Union, grade: A-, University of Basel (Europainstitut), language: English, abstract: Authors have proved hypothesis: Turkey¿s military capabilities, experience in NATO andinternational peace keeping operations and missions could rather strengthen than weakenESDP position. However, there are some weaknesses that Turkey faces (focus on ¿hard¿rather than ¿soft¿ power, military is in the process of modernizing, underestimated role inpeace keeping operations), Turkey¿s contribution to ESDP is too significant (stronginvolvement in the missions) and will give more benefits than costs. Furthermore, Turkishaccession to the EU would transform strategic challenges of ESDP.51Only five of twenty ESDP peace keeping operations have been of a military nature, whichmostly has been held by NATO or UN. ¿When it comes to much bigger military issues, theEU avoids taking strategic responsibility and still depends on the NATO to do its ¿dirtywork¿¿52. Therefore military stronger EU would give NATO and UN credit that EU is alsoresponsible in the field of crisis management. Such win-win situation would exempt USSecretary¿s of State Madeleine Albright¿s the ¿3 D¿s¿: 1) decoupling of ESDP from NATO2) duplication of capabilities, 3) discrimination of non-EU NATO members.53 Turkey wouldalso play role of agent between EU and NATO and ¿parties involved will benefit from threelevelgame¿54 (EU-Turkey-NATO). Therefore it is advantageous and beneficial not only forTurkey, but also for the EU and the NATO as well.55Finally, last week Enlargement Commissioner Olli Rehn once more showed that EU wouldnot allow Turkey 'cruise control' on accession.56 Therefore Turkey-EU relations shouldbalance the contributions and benefits of such partnership and show that both partners can beproducers and consumers of security and experience of defence. Such dialogue will prove thatEU can play an important role in CFSP/ESDP dimension also in the future.Books on Demand GmbH, Überseering 33, 22297 Hamburg 24 pp. Englisch. Nº de ref. del artículo: 9783640872091
Cantidad disponible: 2 disponibles
Librería: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Alemania
Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - Seminar paper from the year 2009 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: European Union, grade: A-, University of Basel (Europainstitut), language: English, abstract: Authors have proved hypothesis: Turkey's military capabilities, experience in NATO andinternational peace keeping operations and missions could rather strengthen than weakenESDP position. However, there are some weaknesses that Turkey faces (focus on 'hard'rather than 'soft' power, military is in the process of modernizing, underestimated role inpeace keeping operations), Turkey's contribution to ESDP is too significant (stronginvolvement in the missions) and will give more benefits than costs. Furthermore, Turkishaccession to the EU would transform strategic challenges of ESDP.51Only five of twenty ESDP peace keeping operations have been of a military nature, whichmostly has been held by NATO or UN. 'When it comes to much bigger military issues, theEU avoids taking strategic responsibility and still depends on the NATO to do its 'dirtywork''52. Therefore military stronger EU would give NATO and UN credit that EU is alsoresponsible in the field of crisis management. Such win-win situation would exempt USSecretary's of State Madeleine Albright's the '3 D's': 1) decoupling of ESDP from NATO,2) duplication of capabilities, 3) discrimination of non-EU NATO members.53 Turkey wouldalso play role of agent between EU and NATO and 'parties involved will benefit from threelevelgame'54 (EU-Turkey-NATO). Therefore it is advantageous and beneficial not only forTurkey, but also for the EU and the NATO as well.55Finally, last week Enlargement Commissioner Olli Rehn once more showed that EU wouldnot allow Turkey 'cruise control' on accession.56 Therefore Turkey-EU relations shouldbalance the contributions and benefits of such partnership and show that both partners can beproducers and consumers of security and experience of defence. Such dialogue will prove thatEU can play an important role in CFSP/ESDP dimension also in the future. Nº de ref. del artículo: 9783640872091
Cantidad disponible: 1 disponibles
Librería: preigu, Osnabrück, Alemania
Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. Debates on Turkey's accession to EU: CFSP/ESDP | Karina Oborune (u. a.) | Taschenbuch | 24 S. | Englisch | 2011 | GRIN Verlag | EAN 9783640872091 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: BoD - Books on Demand, In de Tarpen 42, 22848 Norderstedt, info[at]bod[dot]de | Anbieter: preigu. Nº de ref. del artículo: 107065061
Cantidad disponible: 5 disponibles