This study is of an experimental inductive nature, and it reports on the level of comprehension rendered by two input channels to the brain, the auditory and the visual inputs in L1, Arabic and L2, English. The comparison, held between the two input channels, is three dimensional, as the experiment is administered under three conditions; traditional, anti-traditional and equality state. The sample comprises 20 male participants (n = 20) who were assessed in 16 activities of listening and reading, 8 activities in L1, Arabic, and 8 in L2, English. Participants are all Arab university students of intermediate level in L2, English. Intra-language comparisons are beyond the scope of the study. The data revealed that the visual input, reading, renders significantly a better comprehension level than does the auditory input in L1, Arabic, but the auditory input, listening, renders significantly a better comprehension level in L2, English. Results significantly support the hypothesis that traditional administration conditions are reading advantage except for reading in L1, Arabic, in which results are insignificant.
"Sinopsis" puede pertenecer a otra edición de este libro.
This study is of an experimental inductive nature, and it reports on the level of comprehension rendered by two input channels to the brain, the auditory and the visual inputs in L1, Arabic and L2, English. The comparison, held between the two input channels, is three dimensional, as the experiment is administered under three conditions; traditional, anti-traditional and equality state. The sample comprises 20 male participants (n = 20) who were assessed in 16 activities of listening and reading, 8 activities in L1, Arabic, and 8 in L2, English. Participants are all Arab university students of intermediate level in L2, English. Intra-language comparisons are beyond the scope of the study. The data revealed that the visual input, reading, renders significantly a better comprehension level than does the auditory input in L1, Arabic, but the auditory input, listening, renders significantly a better comprehension level in L2, English. Results significantly support the hypothesis that traditional administration conditions are reading advantage except for reading in L1, Arabic, in which results are insignificant.
Anas M. Shaban concluded his Master of Arts in Applied Linguistics and TESOL from Anglia Ruskin University, the UK. He is currently the Academic Coordination Unit Head at the English Language Institute, King Abdulaziz University. He has extensive teaching, assessment & managerial experience in ELT.
"Sobre este título" puede pertenecer a otra edición de este libro.
EUR 19,49 gastos de envío desde Alemania a España
Destinos, gastos y plazos de envíoLibrería: moluna, Greven, Alemania
Condición: New. Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. Autor/Autorin: M. Shaban AnasAnas M. Shaban concluded his Master of Arts in Applied Linguistics and TESOL from Anglia Ruskin University, the UK. He is currently the Academic Coordination Unit Head at the English Language Institute, King Abdulaziz U. Nº de ref. del artículo: 151243126
Cantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles
Librería: BuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K., Bergisch Gladbach, Alemania
Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -This study is of an experimental inductive nature, and it reports on the level of comprehension rendered by two input channels to the brain, the auditory and the visual inputs in L1, Arabic and L2, English. The comparison, held between the two input channels, is three dimensional, as the experiment is administered under three conditions; traditional, anti-traditional and equality state. The sample comprises 20 male participants (n = 20) who were assessed in 16 activities of listening and reading, 8 activities in L1, Arabic, and 8 in L2, English. Participants are all Arab university students of intermediate level in L2, English. Intra-language comparisons are beyond the scope of the study. The data revealed that the visual input, reading, renders significantly a better comprehension level than does the auditory input in L1, Arabic, but the auditory input, listening, renders significantly a better comprehension level in L2, English. Results significantly support the hypothesis that traditional administration conditions are reading advantage except for reading in L1, Arabic, in which results are insignificant. 160 pp. Englisch. Nº de ref. del artículo: 9783330844063
Cantidad disponible: 2 disponibles
Librería: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Alemania
Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware - Printed after ordering - This study is of an experimental inductive nature, and it reports on the level of comprehension rendered by two input channels to the brain, the auditory and the visual inputs in L1, Arabic and L2, English. The comparison, held between the two input channels, is three dimensional, as the experiment is administered under three conditions; traditional, anti-traditional and equality state. The sample comprises 20 male participants (n = 20) who were assessed in 16 activities of listening and reading, 8 activities in L1, Arabic, and 8 in L2, English. Participants are all Arab university students of intermediate level in L2, English. Intra-language comparisons are beyond the scope of the study. The data revealed that the visual input, reading, renders significantly a better comprehension level than does the auditory input in L1, Arabic, but the auditory input, listening, renders significantly a better comprehension level in L2, English. Results significantly support the hypothesis that traditional administration conditions are reading advantage except for reading in L1, Arabic, in which results are insignificant. Nº de ref. del artículo: 9783330844063
Cantidad disponible: 1 disponibles
Librería: Revaluation Books, Exeter, Reino Unido
Paperback. Condición: Brand New. 160 pages. 8.66x5.91x0.37 inches. In Stock. Nº de ref. del artículo: 333084406X
Cantidad disponible: 1 disponibles