Neoclassical economists assume that people act to maximize their well-being: they choose based on their desires and only desire what they will like. Neuroscientists and psychologists disagree. Their research demonstrates that cues and evolutionary quirks cause people to act against their best interests, even choosing alternatives they will not like.
In this book, Edward R. Morey contrasts neoclassical choice theory with behavioral models and findings in psychology, neuroscience, evolutionary biology, and animal behavior. The book addresses the fundamental idea within economics that behaviors are chosen, and it explains why other disciplines disagree. The chapters touch on modeling behavior, judging behavior, and policies.
Morey breaks down judgment using the ethics of welfare economics, and it compares and contrasts this recognized approach with others, including Mill's liberalism, virtue ethics, duty-based ethics, Buddhist ethics, and utilitarianism.
"Sinopsis" puede pertenecer a otra edición de este libro.
Edward R. Morey is a Professor Emeritus at the University of Colorado, Boulder, USA. His research has centered on modeling and estimating individual behavior.
Neoclassical economists assume that people act to maximize their well-being: they choose based on their desires and only desire what they will like. Neuroscientists and psychologists disagree. Their research demonstrates that cues and evolutionary quirks cause people to act against their best interests, even choosing alternatives they will not like.
In this book, Edward R. Morey contrasts neoclassical choice theory with behavioral models and findings in psychology, neuroscience, evolutionary biology, and animal behavior. The book addresses the fundamental idea within economics that behaviors are chosen, and it explains why other disciplines disagree. The chapters touch on modeling behavior, judging behavior, and policies.
Morey breaks down judgment using the ethics of welfare economics, and it compares and contrasts this recognized approach with others, including Mill’s liberalism, virtue ethics, duty-based ethics, Buddhist ethics, and utilitarianism.
Edward R. Morey is a Professor Emeritus at the University of Colorado, Boulder, USA. His research has centered on modeling and estimating individual behavior.
"Sobre este título" puede pertenecer a otra edición de este libro.
Librería: Brook Bookstore On Demand, Napoli, NA, Italia
Condición: new. Questo è un articolo print on demand. Nº de ref. del artículo: K2WMAULDWD
Cantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles
Librería: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Reino Unido
Condición: New. In. Nº de ref. del artículo: ria9783031367113_new
Cantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles
Librería: BuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K., Bergisch Gladbach, Alemania
Buch. Condición: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -Neoclassical economists assume that people act to maximize their well-being: they choose based on their desires and only desire what they will like. Neuroscientists and psychologists disagree. Their research demonstrates that cues and evolutionary quirks cause people to act against their best interests, even choosing alternatives they will not like.In this book, Edward R. Morey contrasts neoclassical choice theory with behavioral models and findings in psychology, neuroscience, evolutionary biology, and animal behavior. The book addresses the fundamental idea within economics that behaviors are chosen, and it explains why other disciplines disagree. The chapters touch on modeling behavior, judging behavior, and policies. Morey breaks down judgment using the ethics of welfare economics, and it compares and contrasts this recognized approach with others, including Mill's liberalism, virtue ethics, duty-based ethics, Buddhist ethics, and utilitarianism. 484 pp. Englisch. Nº de ref. del artículo: 9783031367113
Cantidad disponible: 2 disponibles
Librería: moluna, Greven, Alemania
Condición: New. Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. Neoclassical economists assume that people act to maximize their well-being: they choose based on their desires and only desire what they will like. Neuroscientists and psychologists disagree. Their research demonstrates that cues and evolutionary quirks. Nº de ref. del artículo: 881233622
Cantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles
Librería: Kennys Bookshop and Art Galleries Ltd., Galway, GY, Irlanda
Condición: New. 2023. Hardcover. . . . . . Nº de ref. del artículo: V9783031367113
Cantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles
Librería: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Alemania
Buch. Condición: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - Neoclassical economists assume that people act to maximize their well-being: they choose based on their desires and only desire what they will like. Neuroscientists and psychologists disagree. Their research demonstrates that cues and evolutionary quirks cause people to act against their best interests, even choosing alternatives they will not like.In this book, Edward R. Morey contrasts neoclassical choice theory with behavioral models and findings in psychology, neuroscience, evolutionary biology, and animal behavior. The book addresses the fundamental idea within economics that behaviors are chosen, and it explains why other disciplines disagree. The chapters touch on modeling behavior, judging behavior, and policies. Morey breaks down judgment using the ethics of welfare economics, and it compares and contrasts this recognized approach with others, including Mill's liberalism, virtue ethics, duty-based ethics, Buddhist ethics, and utilitarianism. Nº de ref. del artículo: 9783031367113
Cantidad disponible: 1 disponibles
Librería: Books Puddle, New York, NY, Estados Unidos de America
Condición: New. Nº de ref. del artículo: 26396414099
Cantidad disponible: 4 disponibles
Librería: CitiRetail, Stevenage, Reino Unido
Hardcover. Condición: new. Hardcover. Neoclassical economists assume that people act to maximize their well-being: they choose based on their desires and only desire what they will like. Neuroscientists and psychologists disagree. Their research demonstrates that cues and evolutionary quirks cause people to act against their best interests, even choosing alternatives they will not like. In this book, Edward R. Morey contrasts neoclassical choice theory with behavioral models and findings in psychology, neuroscience, evolutionary biology, and animal behavior. The book addresses the fundamental idea within economics that behaviors are chosen, and it explains why other disciplines disagree. The chapters touch on modeling behavior, judging behavior, and policies. Morey breaks down judgment using the ethics of welfare economics, and it compares and contrasts this recognized approach with others, including Mills liberalism, virtue ethics, duty-based ethics, Buddhist ethics, and utilitarianism. Morey breaks down judgment using the ethics of welfare economics, and it compares and contrasts this recognized approach with others, including Mills liberalism, virtue ethics, duty-based ethics, Buddhist ethics, and utilitarianism. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from our UK warehouse or from our Australian or US warehouses, depending on stock availability. Nº de ref. del artículo: 9783031367113
Cantidad disponible: 1 disponibles
Librería: Majestic Books, Hounslow, Reino Unido
Condición: New. Print on Demand. Nº de ref. del artículo: 399995724
Cantidad disponible: 4 disponibles
Librería: buchversandmimpf2000, Emtmannsberg, BAYE, Alemania
Buch. Condición: Neu. This item is printed on demand - Print on Demand Titel. Neuware -Introduction.- Part I: An ordering of paths, well-being, and economics: how to make you, a chimp, or even a cactus, better off .- Chapter 1: Economicus: assumptions of a neoclassical theory of behavior, and their implications- my take.- Chapter 2: Welfare (well-faring) economics as a theory of what is right and wrong-my take.- chapter 3: Could economicus be the product of evolution rather than the creation of God .- Chapter 4: Wanting versus liking, and happiness: an electrical/chemical stew.- Chapter 5: Does consuming more increase WB Is getting rich the path to happiness .- Chapter 6: Common quirks, incorrect beliefs, and flawed choosing.- Chapter 7: The endowment effect.- Chapter 8: Returning to whether all the different kinds of WB are commensurable and whether all the different bearers-of-WB are comparable.- Part II: What is a choice Choice or the illusion of choice .- Chapter 9: How would you define a choice And the difference between a choice and the experience/sense of making a choice.- Chapter 10: The evidence on conscious choice.- Part III: Most moral philosophers are not welfare consequentialists, so what are they .- Chapter 11: A primer on welfare economics vs. other ethics.- Chapter 12: A bit more on welfare economics, external effects, and interpersonal comparisons of WB.- Epilogue: Do you make choices, and if so, has your choosing made you happy .Springer-Verlag GmbH, Tiergartenstr. 17, 69121 Heidelberg 484 pp. Englisch. Nº de ref. del artículo: 9783031367113
Cantidad disponible: 1 disponibles