Artículos relacionados a Quantifying Research Integrity (Synthesis Lectures...
Quantifying Research Integrity (Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services) - Tapa blanda
Sinopsis
Institutions typically treat research integrity violations as black and white, right or wrong. The result is that the wide range of grayscale nuances that separate accident, carelessness, and bad practice from deliberate fraud and malpractice often get lost. This lecture looks at how to quantify the grayscale range in three kinds of research integrity violations: plagiarism, data falsification, and image manipulation.
Quantification works best with plagiarism, because the essential one-to-one matching algorithms are well known and established tools for detecting when matches exist. Questions remain, however, of how many matching words of what kind in what location in which discipline constitute reasonable suspicion of fraudulent intent. Different disciplines take different perspectives on quantity and location. Quantification is harder with data falsification, because the original data are often not available, and because experimental replication remains surprisingly difficult. The same is true with image manipulation, where tools exist for detecting certain kinds of manipulations, but where the tools are also easily defeated.
This lecture looks at how to prevent violations of research integrity from a pragmatic viewpoint, and at what steps can institutions and publishers take to discourage problems beyond the usual ethical admonitions. There are no simple answers, but two measures can help: the systematic use of detection tools and requiring original data and images. These alone do not suffice, but they represent a start.
The scholarly community needs a better awareness of the complexity of research integrity decisions. Only an open and wide-spread international discussion can bring about a consensus on where the boundary lines are and when grayscale problems shade into black. One goal of this work is to move that discussion forward.
"Sinopsis" puede pertenecer a otra edición de este libro.
Acerca del autor
Michael Seadle is a professor at Humboldt-Universitat zu Berlin, and is the chair of the Commission on Research Malpractice. His experience with research integrity issues builds in part on over 20 years of experience as a journal editor, where he confronted plagiarism and other research integrity issues. As dean he also dealt with such issues at the bachelors and masters level. When Elsevier approached him to fund a research project, he suggested research integrity. This led to the establishment of the HEADT Centre (Humboldt-Elsevier Advanced Data and Text Centre), whose mission is in part to investigate research integrity issues.
"Sobre este título" puede pertenecer a otra edición de este libro.
Comprar nuevo
Ver este artículo
EUR 48,14
EUR 11,00 gastos de envío desde Alemania a España
Destinos, gastos y plazos de envío
Resultados de la búsqueda para Quantifying Research Integrity (Synthesis Lectures...
Imagen del vendedor
Quantifying Research Integrity
Publicado por
Springer International Publishing Dez 2016, 2016
ISBN 10: 3031011783
ISBN 13: 9783031011788
Nuevo
Taschenbuch
Librería: BuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K., Bergisch Gladbach, Alemania
Calificación del vendedor: 5 de 5 estrellas
Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -Institutions typically treat research integrity violations as black and white, right or wrong. The result is that the wide range of grayscale nuances that separate accident, carelessness, and bad practice from deliberate fraud and malpractice often get lost. This lecture looks at how to quantify the grayscale range in three kinds of research integrity violations: plagiarism, data falsification, and image manipulation.Quantification works best with plagiarism, because the essential one-to-one matching algorithms are well known and established tools for detecting when matches exist. Questions remain, however, of how many matching words of what kind in what location in which discipline constitute reasonable suspicion of fraudulent intent. Different disciplines take different perspectives on quantity and location. Quantification is harder with data falsification, because the original data are often not available, and because experimental replication remains surprisingly difficult. The same is true with image manipulation, where tools exist for detecting certain kinds of manipulations, but where the tools are also easily defeated.This lecture looks at how to prevent violations of research integrity from a pragmatic viewpoint, and at what steps can institutions and publishers take to discourage problems beyond the usual ethical admonitions. There are no simple answers, but two measures can help: the systematic use of detection tools and requiring original data and images. These alone do not suffice, but they represent a start.The scholarly community needs a better awareness of the complexity of research integrity decisions. Only an open and wide-spread international discussion can bring about a consensus on where the boundary lines are and when grayscale problems shade into black. One goal of this work is to move that discussion forward. 144 pp. Englisch. Nº de ref. del artículo: 9783031011788
Cantidad disponible: 2 disponibles
Imagen del vendedor
Quantifying Research Integrity
Publicado por
Springer International Publishing, 2016
ISBN 10: 3031011783
ISBN 13: 9783031011788
Nuevo
Taschenbuch
Librería: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Alemania
Calificación del vendedor: 5 de 5 estrellas
Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - Institutions typically treat research integrity violations as black and white, right or wrong. The result is that the wide range of grayscale nuances that separate accident, carelessness, and bad practice from deliberate fraud and malpractice often get lost. This lecture looks at how to quantify the grayscale range in three kinds of research integrity violations: plagiarism, data falsification, and image manipulation.Quantification works best with plagiarism, because the essential one-to-one matching algorithms are well known and established tools for detecting when matches exist. Questions remain, however, of how many matching words of what kind in what location in which discipline constitute reasonable suspicion of fraudulent intent. Different disciplines take different perspectives on quantity and location. Quantification is harder with data falsification, because the original data are often not available, and because experimental replication remains surprisingly difficult. The same is true with image manipulation, where tools exist for detecting certain kinds of manipulations, but where the tools are also easily defeated.This lecture looks at how to prevent violations of research integrity from a pragmatic viewpoint, and at what steps can institutions and publishers take to discourage problems beyond the usual ethical admonitions. There are no simple answers, but two measures can help: the systematic use of detection tools and requiring original data and images. These alone do not suffice, but they represent a start.The scholarly community needs a better awareness of the complexity of research integrity decisions. Only an open and wide-spread international discussion can bring about a consensus on where the boundary lines are and when grayscale problems shade into black. One goal of this work is to move that discussion forward. Nº de ref. del artículo: 9783031011788
Cantidad disponible: 1 disponibles
Imagen del vendedor
Quantifying Research Integrity
Publicado por
Springer, Berlin|Springer International Publishing|Morgan & Claypool|Springer, 2016
ISBN 10: 3031011783
ISBN 13: 9783031011788
Nuevo
Tapa blanda
Librería: moluna, Greven, Alemania
Calificación del vendedor: 5 de 5 estrellas
Condición: New. Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. Institutions typically treat research integrity violations as black and white, right or wrong. The result is that the wide range of grayscale nuances that separate accident, carelessness, and bad practice from deliberate fraud and malpractice often get l. Nº de ref. del artículo: 608129419
Cantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles
Imagen de archivo
Quantifying Research Integrity (Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services)
Librería: Books Puddle, New York, NY, Estados Unidos de America
Calificación del vendedor: 4 de 5 estrellas
Condición: New. 1st edition NO-PA16APR2015-KAP. Nº de ref. del artículo: 26394683599
Cantidad disponible: 4 disponibles
Imagen de archivo
Quantifying Research Integrity (Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services)
Impresión bajo demandaLibrería: Majestic Books, Hounslow, Reino Unido
Calificación del vendedor: 5 de 5 estrellas
Condición: New. Print on Demand. Nº de ref. del artículo: 401726224
Cantidad disponible: 4 disponibles
Imagen de archivo
Quantifying Research Integrity (Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services)
Impresión bajo demandaLibrería: Biblios, Frankfurt am main, HESSE, Alemania
Calificación del vendedor: 5 de 5 estrellas
Condición: New. PRINT ON DEMAND. Nº de ref. del artículo: 18394683589
Cantidad disponible: 4 disponibles
Imagen del vendedor
Quantifying Research Integrity
Publicado por
Springer International Publishing, Springer International Publishing Dez 2016, 2016
ISBN 10: 3031011783
ISBN 13: 9783031011788
Nuevo
Taschenbuch
Librería: buchversandmimpf2000, Emtmannsberg, BAYE, Alemania
Calificación del vendedor: 5 de 5 estrellas
Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. Neuware -Institutions typically treat research integrity violations as black and white, right or wrong. The result is that the wide range of grayscale nuances that separate accident, carelessness, and bad practice from deliberate fraud and malpractice often get lost. This lecture looks at how to quantify the grayscale range in three kinds of research integrity violations: plagiarism, data falsification, and image manipulation.Quantification works best with plagiarism, because the essential one-to-one matching algorithms are well known and established tools for detecting when matches exist. Questions remain, however, of how many matching words of what kind in what location in which discipline constitute reasonable suspicion of fraudulent intent. Different disciplines take different perspectives on quantity and location. Quantification is harder with data falsification, because the original data are often not available, and because experimental replication remains surprisingly difficult. The same is true with image manipulation, where tools exist for detecting certain kinds of manipulations, but where the tools are also easily defeated.This lecture looks at how to prevent violations of research integrity from a pragmatic viewpoint, and at what steps can institutions and publishers take to discourage problems beyond the usual ethical admonitions. There are no simple answers, but two measures can help: the systematic use of detection tools and requiring original data and images. These alone do not suffice, but they represent a start.The scholarly community needs a better awareness of the complexity of research integrity decisions. Only an open and wide-spread international discussion can bring about a consensus on where the boundary lines are and when grayscale problems shade into black. One goal of this work is to move that discussion forward.Springer Verlag GmbH, Tiergartenstr. 17, 69121 Heidelberg 144 pp. Englisch. Nº de ref. del artículo: 9783031011788
Cantidad disponible: 2 disponibles