What is racism? is a timely question that is hotly contested in the philosophy of race. Yet disagreement about racism’s nature does not begin in philosophy, but in the sociopolitical domain. Alberto G. Urquidez argues that philosophers of race have failed to pay sufficient attention to the practical considerations that prompt the question “What is racism?” Most theorists assume that “racism” signifies a language-independent phenomenon that needs to be “discovered” by the relevant science or “uncovered” by close scrutiny of everyday usage of this term. (Re-)Defining Racism challenges this metaphysical paradigm. Urquidez develops a Wittgenstein-inspired framework that illuminates the use of terms like “definition,” “meaning,” “explanation of meaning,” and “disagreement,” for the analysis of contested normative concepts. These elucidations reveal that providing a definition of “racism” amounts to recommending a form of moral representation—a rule for the correct use of “racism.” As definitional recommendations must be justified on pragmatic grounds, Urquidez takes as a starting point for justification the interests of racism's historical victims.
"Sinopsis" puede pertenecer a otra edición de este libro.
Alberto G. Urquidez is currently a CFD Postdoctoral Fellow in Philosophy at Bowdoin College, USA. .
<p><i>What is racism?</i> is a timely question that is hotly contested in the philosophy of race. Yet disagreement about racism’s nature does not begin in philosophy, but in the sociopolitical domain. Alberto G. Urquidez argues that philosophers of race have failed to pay sufficient attention to the practical considerations that prompt the question “What is racism?” Most theorists assume that “racism” signifies a language-independent phenomenon that needs to be “discovered” by the relevant science or “uncovered” by close scrutiny of everyday usage of this term. <i>(Re-)Defining Racism </i>challenges this metaphysical paradigm. Urquidez develops a Wittgenstein-inspired framework that illuminates the use of terms like “definition,” “meaning,” “explanation of meaning,” and “disagreement,” for the analysis of contested normative concepts. These elucidations reveal that providing a definition of “racism” amounts to recommending a form of moral representation—a rule for the correct use of “racism.” As definitional recommendations must be justified on pragmatic grounds, Urquidez takes as a starting point for justification the interests of racism's historical victims.</p><br><p></p>
"Sobre este título" puede pertenecer a otra edición de este libro.
Librería: Brook Bookstore On Demand, Napoli, NA, Italia
Condición: new. Questo è un articolo print on demand. Nº de ref. del artículo: 561fa678b753dcbc3e71d0e954797991
Cantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles
Librería: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Reino Unido
Condición: New. In. Nº de ref. del artículo: ria9783030272593_new
Cantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles
Librería: Chiron Media, Wallingford, Reino Unido
Paperback. Condición: New. Nº de ref. del artículo: 6666-IUK-9783030272593
Cantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles
Librería: BuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K., Bergisch Gladbach, Alemania
Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -What is racism is a timely question that is hotly contested in the philosophy of race. Yet disagreement about racism's nature does not begin in philosophy, but in the sociopolitical domain. Alberto G. Urquidez argues that philosophers of race have failed to pay sufficient attention to the practical considerations that prompt the question 'What is racism ' Most theorists assume that 'racism' signifies a language-independent phenomenon that needs to be 'discovered' by the relevant science or 'uncovered' by close scrutiny of everyday usage of this term. (Re-)Defining Racism challenges this metaphysical paradigm. Urquidez develops a Wittgenstein-inspired framework that illuminates the use of terms like 'definition,' 'meaning,' 'explanation of meaning,' and 'disagreement,' for the analysis of contested normative concepts. These elucidations reveal that providing a definition of 'racism' amounts to recommending a form of moral representation-a rule for the correct use of 'racism.' As definitional recommendations must be justified on pragmatic grounds, Urquidez takes as a starting point for justification the interests of racism's historical victims. 436 pp. Englisch. Nº de ref. del artículo: 9783030272593
Cantidad disponible: 2 disponibles
Librería: Kennys Bookshop and Art Galleries Ltd., Galway, GY, Irlanda
Condición: New. Nº de ref. del artículo: V9783030272593
Cantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles
Librería: moluna, Greven, Alemania
Condición: New. Nº de ref. del artículo: 466230446
Cantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles
Librería: Books Puddle, New York, NY, Estados Unidos de America
Condición: New. Nº de ref. del artículo: 26384723387
Cantidad disponible: 4 disponibles
Librería: Majestic Books, Hounslow, Reino Unido
Condición: New. Print on Demand. Nº de ref. del artículo: 379180644
Cantidad disponible: 4 disponibles
Librería: Biblios, Frankfurt am main, HESSE, Alemania
Condición: New. PRINT ON DEMAND. Nº de ref. del artículo: 18384723377
Cantidad disponible: 4 disponibles
Librería: Revaluation Books, Exeter, Reino Unido
Paperback. Condición: Brand New. 434 pages. 8.26x5.82x0.99 inches. In Stock. Nº de ref. del artículo: x-3030272591
Cantidad disponible: 2 disponibles