Ever since Chomsky laid the framework for a mathematically formal theory of syntax, two classes of formal models have held wide appeal. The finite state model offered simplicity. At the opposite extreme numerous very powerful models, most notable transformational grammar, offered generality. As soon as this mathematical framework was laid, devastating arguments were given by Chomsky and others indicating that the finite state model was woefully inadequate for the syntax of natural language. In response, the completely general transformational grammar model was advanced as a suitable vehicle for capturing the description of natural language syntax. While transformational grammar seems likely to be adequate to the task, many researchers have advanced the argument that it is "too adequate. " A now classic result of Peters and Ritchie shows that the model of transformational grammar given in Chomsky’s Aspects [IJ is powerful indeed. So powerful as to allow it to describe any recursively enumerable set. In other words it can describe the syntax of any language that is describable by any algorithmic process whatsoever. This situation led many researchers to reasses the claim that natural languages are included in the class of transformational grammar languages. The conclu sion that many reached is that the claim is void of content, since, in their view, it says little more than that natural language syntax is doable algo rithmically and, in the framework of modern linguistics, psychology or neuroscience, that is axiomatic.
"Sinopsis" puede pertenecer a otra edición de este libro.
` .. Savitch et al. have done an excellent job, both in their selections and in their commentaries, of giving a solid introduction to a sparsely cultivated but already complex field. They have also done much to foster the dissemination and the comprehension of formal complexity results in liguistics and to encourage accuracy and lucidity in the formulation, presentation, and interpretation of such results.'
A. Manaster-Ramer in Computational Linguistics, 14:4 (December 1988)
Ever since Chomsky laid the framework for a mathematically formal theory of syntax, two classes of formal models have held wide appeal. The finite state model offered simplicity. At the opposite extreme numerous very powerful models, most notable transformational grammar, offered generality. As soon as this mathematical framework was laid, devastating arguments were given by Chomsky and others indicating that the finite state model was woefully inadequate for the syntax of natural language. In response, the completely general transformational grammar model was advanced as a suitable vehicle for capturing the description of natural language syntax. While transformational grammar seems likely to be adequate to the task, many researchers have advanced the argument that it is "too adequate. " A now classic result of Peters and Ritchie shows that the model of transformational grammar given in Chomsky's Aspects [IJ is powerful indeed. So powerful as to allow it to describe any recursively enumerable set. In other words it can describe the syntax of any language that is describable by any algorithmic process whatsoever. This situation led many researchers to reasses the claim that natural languages are included in the class of transformational grammar languages. The conclu sion that many reached is that the claim is void of content, since, in their view, it says little more than that natural language syntax is doable algo rithmically and, in the framework of modern linguistics, psychology or neuroscience, that is axiomatic.
"Sobre este título" puede pertenecer a otra edición de este libro.
Librería: Recycle Bookstore, San Jose, CA, Estados Unidos de America
Paperback. Condición: Very Good. Book has light rubbing and smudging to covers with a couple of indents/surface scratches to center of front cover, light scuffs and bumps to edges and corners, faint aging to pages. otherwise in very good condition, strong binding, clean and unmarked pages; some cosmetic wear but an overall sturdy, handsome copy. Nº de ref. del artículo: 991150
Cantidad disponible: 1 disponibles
Librería: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Reino Unido
Condición: New. In. Nº de ref. del artículo: ria9781556080470_new
Cantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles
Librería: Kennys Bookshop and Art Galleries Ltd., Galway, GY, Irlanda
Condición: New. Editor(s): Savitch, Walter J.; Bach, E. (University of Massachusetts at Amherst, USA); Marsh, W. E.; Safran-Naveh, Gila. Series: Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy. Num Pages: 470 pages, 1 black & white illustrations. BIC Classification: UYQL. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational; (UP) Postgraduate, Research & Scholarly; (UU) Undergraduate. Dimension: 235 x 155 x 24. Weight in Grams: 740. . 1987. Softcover reprint of the original 1st ed. 1987. Paperback. . . . . Nº de ref. del artículo: V9781556080470
Cantidad disponible: 15 disponibles
Librería: Books Puddle, New York, NY, Estados Unidos de America
Condición: New. pp. 472. Nº de ref. del artículo: 26127796092
Cantidad disponible: 4 disponibles
Librería: moluna, Greven, Alemania
Kartoniert / Broschiert. Condición: New. Ever since Chomsky laid the framework for a mathematically formal theory of syntax, two classes of formal models have held wide appeal. The finite state model offered simplicity. At the opposite extreme numerous very powerful models, most notable transforma. Nº de ref. del artículo: 4215239
Cantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles
Librería: Majestic Books, Hounslow, Reino Unido
Condición: New. Print on Demand pp. 472 49:B&W 6.14 x 9.21 in or 234 x 156 mm (Royal 8vo) Perfect Bound on White w/Gloss Lam. Nº de ref. del artículo: 132758691
Cantidad disponible: 4 disponibles
Librería: Biblios, Frankfurt am main, HESSE, Alemania
Condición: New. PRINT ON DEMAND pp. 472. Nº de ref. del artículo: 18127796086
Cantidad disponible: 4 disponibles
Librería: Revaluation Books, Exeter, Reino Unido
Paperback. Condición: Brand New. reprint edition. 470 pages. 9.25x6.10x0.95 inches. In Stock. Nº de ref. del artículo: x-1556080476
Cantidad disponible: 2 disponibles
Librería: Kennys Bookstore, Olney, MD, Estados Unidos de America
Condición: New. Editor(s): Savitch, Walter J.; Bach, E. (University of Massachusetts at Amherst, USA); Marsh, W. E.; Safran-Naveh, Gila. Series: Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy. Num Pages: 470 pages, 1 black & white illustrations. BIC Classification: UYQL. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational; (UP) Postgraduate, Research & Scholarly; (UU) Undergraduate. Dimension: 235 x 155 x 24. Weight in Grams: 740. . 1987. Softcover reprint of the original 1st ed. 1987. Paperback. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland. Nº de ref. del artículo: V9781556080470
Cantidad disponible: 15 disponibles
Librería: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Alemania
Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. Neuware - Ever since Chomsky laid the framework for a mathematically formal theory of syntax, two classes of formal models have held wide appeal. The finite state model offered simplicity. At the opposite extreme numerous very powerful models, most notable transformational grammar, offered generality. As soon as this mathematical framework was laid, devastating arguments were given by Chomsky and others indicating that the finite state model was woefully inadequate for the syntax of natural language. In response, the completely general transformational grammar model was advanced as a suitable vehicle for capturing the description of natural language syntax. While transformational grammar seems likely to be adequate to the task, many researchers have advanced the argument that it is 'too adequate. ' A now classic result of Peters and Ritchie shows that the model of transformational grammar given in Chomsky's Aspects [IJ is powerful indeed. So powerful as to allow it to describe any recursively enumerable set. In other words it can describe the syntax of any language that is describable by any algorithmic process whatsoever. This situation led many researchers to reasses the claim that natural languages are included in the class of transformational grammar languages. The conclu sion that many reached is that the claim is void of content, since, in their view, it says little more than that natural language syntax is doable algo rithmically and, in the framework of modern linguistics, psychology or neuroscience, that is axiomatic. Nº de ref. del artículo: 9781556080470
Cantidad disponible: 2 disponibles