Federal Courts (Examples & Explanations) - Tapa blanda

Sinopsis

• Expanded discussion of legislative courts
• Developments on abstention doctrines, including Younger abstention, Trump v. Vance (U.S. 2020), and Colorado River abstention (lower court applications)
• Effect of Moore v. Harper (U.S. 2023) on U.S. Supreme Court review of gerrymandering decisions and analysis of other legislative gerrymandering decisions [Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP (U.S. 2024); Rucho v. Common Cause (U.S. 2024)]
• Supplemental jurisdiction consequence of Royal Canin USA v. Wullschleger (U.S. 2024)
• Discussion of recent U.S. Supreme Court habeas decisions on the Teague exceptions and procedural default
• Discussion of recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions on Eleventh Amendment abrogation [Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico v. Centro de Periodismo Investigativo (U.S. 2023) and Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. Coughlin (U.S. 2023)]
• Analysis of the immunity decision in Trump v. United States (2024)
• Expanded discussion of mootness [FBI v. Fikre (U.S. 2024); New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. City of New York (2020)]

• Forthright treatment of nuanced and unsettled issues in the law— Federal courts is a discipline that resists black letter simplification of legal concepts: this study guide not only recognizes that fact, but also capitalizes on it, without sacrificing clarity or meaningful analysis.
• Award-winning author known for ability to present complicated subjects in an understandable fashion—A widely respected federal courts scholar, Professor Laura Little has lectured worldwide on federal courts issues and is a frequent federal jurisdiction lecturer for federal judges at judicial conferences and programs sponsored by the Federal Judicial Center. She has published several articles in the field of federal court jurisdiction and has won many teaching prizes (including a top teaching honor, the Great Teacher Award) as well as scholarship awards. Her work in procedural subjects has recently been acknowledged by the American Law Institute, which appointed her to serve as Associate Reporter for the Restatement (Third) of Conflict of Laws.
• Accessible and clear writing style and flexible organization—With lucid explanations of complex areas of the law, and written so that each chapter stands on its own, the volume breaks down doctrines into component parts. Organization adapts well to a variety of teaching approaches; topics are organized according to the various functions of federal courts, which gives the book thematic coherence while still allowing students to use the content according to their own needs.
• Visual aids—Includes several graphs and illustrations that illustrate both “macro” and “micro” understandings of the material; some are designed to convey larger relationships among doctrines and institutions, while others are designed to illustrate the intricacies of rules.
• Examples that model good lawyering and exam-taking techniques—The examples demonstrate complexities and ambiguities in the legal doctrine. The explanations provide models of practical skills for coping with uncertainty in the law. Through the explanations, students can learn to anticipate and outline arguments on both sides of a controversy.
• A book highly regarded by other Federal Courts professors—Both new and experienced federal courts professors report that they use the book for their own class preparation. Many professors use the book as a required text for their Federal Courts course.

"Sinopsis" puede pertenecer a otra edición de este libro.