Artículos relacionados a Evaluating Economic Research in a Contested Discipline:...

Evaluating Economic Research in a Contested Discipline: Ranking, Pluralism, and the Future of Heterodox Economics (Studies in Economic Reform and Social Justice) - Tapa blanda

Lee, Frederic S.; Elsner, Wolfram

 
9781444339468: Evaluating Economic Research in a Contested Discipline: Ranking, Pluralism, and the Future of Heterodox Economics (Studies in Economic Reform and Social Justice)
Tapa blanda
ISBN 10: 144433946X ISBN 13: 9781444339468
Editorial: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011

Sinopsis

This book challenges the view that using SSCI journal citations (especially its impact factor score) and peer review/evaluation are the best ways (in that they are the most objective ways) to evaluate economic research.

  • First extensive ranking of heterodox economics journals
  • First ranking of mainstream and heterodox journals
  • Ranking of mainstream and heterodox graduate programs in the US
  • Impact of national research assessment exercises on heterodox economics in Italy and Australia
  • Use of social network analysis to examine the diffusion of heterodox economicsCritique of the use of citation metrics and heterodox economics; Social Science Citation Index with respect to economics is deliberately biased in favour of mainstream journals

"Sinopsis" puede pertenecer a otra edición de este libro.

Acerca del autor

Frederic S. Lee is a Professor of Economics at the University of Missouri-Kansas City. He has published extensively on heterodox microeconomics, on the history of heterodox economics.  He was the editor of the Heterodox Economics Newsletter and the executive director of ICAPE.  He is currently the editor of the American Journal of Economics and Sociology.  He has published in numerous heterodox journals including the Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Review of Radical Political Economics, Review of Social Economy, and the Journal of Economic Issues.

De la contraportada

This book challenges the view that using SSCI journal citations (especially its impact factor score) and peer review/evaluation are the best ways (in that they are the most objective ways) to evaluate economic research. In a contested discipline such as economics those methods are used by mainstream economists to attack and dismiss heterodox economics. In the book, discriminatory use of these methods vis-a-vis heterodox economics is investigated (with case studies in Australia, Italy, and the United States) and discussed. In addition, it is also shown how such methods can be used to promote heterodox economics and heterodox research (without at the same time denigrating mainstream economics and its research). Finally, the book concludes with the unexpected position that a contested economics discipline is a good thing for it makes for better economists who are more capable of contributing in an open and intelligent manner to economic-social policy issues.

"Sobre este título" puede pertenecer a otra edición de este libro.

Editorial
Wiley-Blackwell
Año de publicación
2011
Idioma
Inglés
ISBN 10 
144433946X
ISBN 13 
9781444339468
Encuadernación
Tapa blanda
Número de edición
1
Número de páginas
200
Contacto del fabricante
no disponible
Persona responsable
no disponible