Artículos relacionados a The Scepter of Reason: Public Discussion And Political...
The Scepter of Reason: Public Discussion And Political Radicalism In The Origins Of Constitutionalism: 48 (Law and Philosophy Library, 48) - Tapa blanda
Libro 44 de 106: Law and Philosophy Library
Sinopsis
It is not unusual that formal and informal discussions about the political system, its virtues, and its many defects, conclude in a discussion about impartiality. In fact, we all discuss impartiality when we talk about the best way to equally consider all viewpoints. We show our concerns with impartiality when, facing a particular problem, we try to figure out the best solution for all of us, given our conflicting interests. Thus, the quest for impartiality tends to be a common objective for most of us, although we normally disagree on its particular contents. Generally, these formal and informal discussions about impartiality conclude in a dispute between different "epistemic" conceptions. That is to say, simply, that in these situations we begin to disagree about best procedure to defme the more neutral, impartial solution for all of us.! Basically, trying to answer this question we tend to fluctuate between two opposite positions. According to some, the best way to know which is the more impartial solution is to resort to a process of collective reflection: in those situations we have to consider the opinions of all those who are possibly affected.
"Sinopsis" puede pertenecer a otra edición de este libro.
De la contraportada
It is not unusual that formal and informal discussions about the political system, its virtues, and its many defects, conclude in a discussion about impartiality. In fact, we all discuss impartiality when we talk about the best way to equally consider all viewpoints. We show our concerns with impartiality when, facing a particular problem, we try to figure out the best solution for all of us, given our conflicting interests. Thus, the quest for impartiality tends to be a common objective for most of us, although we normally disagree on its particular contents. Generally, these formal and informal discussions about impartiality conclude in a dispute between different "epistemic" conceptions. That is to say, simply, that in these situations we begin to disagree about best procedure to defme the more neutral, impartial solution for all of us.! Basically, trying to answer this question we tend to fluctuate between two opposite positions. According to some, the best way to know which is the more impartial solution is to resort to a process of collective reflection: in those situations we have to consider the opinions of all those who are possibly affected.
"Sobre este título" puede pertenecer a otra edición de este libro.
Resultados de la búsqueda para The Scepter of Reason: Public Discussion And Political...
Imagen de archivo
The Scepter of Reason : Public Discussion and Political Radicalism in the Origins of Constitutionalism
Impresión bajo demandaLibrería: Chiron Media, Wallingford, Reino Unido
Calificación del vendedor: 5 de 5 estrellas
PF. Condición: New. This item is printed on demand. Brand new book, sourced directly from publisher. Dispatch time is 6-7 days from our warehouse. Book will be sent in robust, secure packaging to ensure it reaches you securely. Nº de ref. del artículo: 6666-IUK-9781402002861
Comprar nuevo
EUR 58,74
Envío por EUR 5,39
Se envía de Reino Unido a Estados Unidos de America
Se envía de Reino Unido a Estados Unidos de America
Cantidad disponible: 20 disponibles
Imagen del vendedor
The Scepter of Reason
Publicado por
Springer Netherlands Nov 2001, 2001
ISBN 10: 1402002866
ISBN 13: 9781402002861
Nuevo
Taschenbuch
Librería: BuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K., Bergisch Gladbach, Alemania
Calificación del vendedor: 5 de 5 estrellas
Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -It is not unusual that formal and informal discussions about the political system, its virtues, and its many defects, conclude in a discussion about impartiality. In fact, we all discuss impartiality when we talk about the best way to equally consider all viewpoints. We show our concerns with impartiality when, facing a particular problem, we try to figure out the best solution for all of us, given our conflicting interests. Thus, the quest for impartiality tends to be a common objective for most of us, although we normally disagree on its particular contents. Generally, these formal and informal discussions about impartiality conclude in a dispute between different 'epistemic' conceptions. That is to say, simply, that in these situations we begin to disagree about best procedure to defme the more neutral, impartial solution for all of us.! Basically, trying to answer this question we tend to fluctuate between two opposite positions. According to some, the best way to know which is the more impartial solution is to resort to a process of collective reflection: in those situations we have to consider the opinions of all those who are possibly affected. 172 pp. Englisch. Nº de ref. del artículo: 9781402002861
Comprar nuevo
EUR 53,49
Envío por EUR 23,00
Se envía de Alemania a Estados Unidos de America
Se envía de Alemania a Estados Unidos de America
Cantidad disponible: 2 disponibles
Imagen de archivo
The Scepter of Reason. Public Discussion and Political Radicalism in the Origins of Constitutionalism.
Publicado por
Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001
ISBN 10: 1402002866
ISBN 13: 9781402002861
Nuevo
Tapa blanda
Librería: Kennys Bookshop and Art Galleries Ltd., Galway, GY, Irlanda
Calificación del vendedor: 5 de 5 estrellas
Condición: New. Explores the origins of Anglo-American Constitutionalism, from both a philosophical and a historical perspective. This book attempts to show that the institutional mechanisms incorporated into the American Constitution were modeled under a strong bias against collective discussion. Series: Law and Philosophy Library. Num Pages: 143 pages, biography. BIC Classification: LAB. Category: (G) General (US: Trade). Dimension: 235 x 155 x 9. Weight in Grams: 550. . 2001. Softcover reprint of the original 1st ed. 2000. Paperback. . . . . Nº de ref. del artículo: V9781402002861
Comprar nuevo
EUR 69,12
Envío por EUR 9,50
Se envía de Irlanda a Estados Unidos de America
Se envía de Irlanda a Estados Unidos de America
Cantidad disponible: 15 disponibles
Imagen de archivo
The Scepter of Reason
Librería: Books Puddle, Woodside, NY, Estados Unidos de America
Calificación del vendedor: 4 de 5 estrellas
Condición: New. pp. 172. Nº de ref. del artículo: 263077483
Comprar nuevo
EUR 83,77
Envío por EUR 3,58
Se envía dentro de Estados Unidos de America
Se envía dentro de Estados Unidos de America
Cantidad disponible: 4 disponibles
Imagen de archivo
The Scepter of Reason
Impresión bajo demandaLibrería: Majestic Books, Hounslow, Reino Unido
Calificación del vendedor: 4 de 5 estrellas
Condición: New. Print on Demand pp. 172 49:B&W 6.14 x 9.21 in or 234 x 156 mm (Royal 8vo) Perfect Bound on White w/Gloss Lam. Nº de ref. del artículo: 5851828
Comprar nuevo
EUR 84,89
Envío por EUR 7,80
Se envía de Reino Unido a Estados Unidos de America
Se envía de Reino Unido a Estados Unidos de America
Cantidad disponible: 4 disponibles
Imagen de archivo
The Scepter of Reason
Impresión bajo demandaLibrería: Biblios, Frankfurt am main, HESSE, Alemania
Calificación del vendedor: 4 de 5 estrellas
Condición: New. PRINT ON DEMAND pp. 172. Nº de ref. del artículo: 183077473
Comprar nuevo
EUR 85,06
Envío por EUR 9,95
Se envía de Alemania a Estados Unidos de America
Se envía de Alemania a Estados Unidos de America
Cantidad disponible: 4 disponibles
Imagen del vendedor
The Scepter of Reason
Publicado por
Springer Netherlands, 2001
ISBN 10: 1402002866
ISBN 13: 9781402002861
Nuevo
Tapa blanda
Librería: moluna, Greven, Alemania
Calificación del vendedor: 5 de 5 estrellas
Condición: New. Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. It is not unusual that formal and informal discussions about the political system, its virtues, and its many defects, conclude in a discussion about impartiality. In fact, we all discuss impartiality when we talk about the best way to equally consider all v. Nº de ref. del artículo: 4091730
Comprar nuevo
EUR 48,37
Envío por EUR 48,99
Se envía de Alemania a Estados Unidos de America
Se envía de Alemania a Estados Unidos de America
Cantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles
Imagen de archivo
The Scepter of Reason. Public Discussion and Political Radicalism in the Origins of Constitutionalism.
Publicado por
Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001
ISBN 10: 1402002866
ISBN 13: 9781402002861
Nuevo
Tapa blanda
Librería: Kennys Bookstore, Olney, MD, Estados Unidos de America
Calificación del vendedor: 5 de 5 estrellas
Condición: New. Explores the origins of Anglo-American Constitutionalism, from both a philosophical and a historical perspective. This book attempts to show that the institutional mechanisms incorporated into the American Constitution were modeled under a strong bias against collective discussion. Series: Law and Philosophy Library. Num Pages: 143 pages, biography. BIC Classification: LAB. Category: (G) General (US: Trade). Dimension: 235 x 155 x 9. Weight in Grams: 550. . 2001. Softcover reprint of the original 1st ed. 2000. Paperback. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland. Nº de ref. del artículo: V9781402002861
Comprar nuevo
EUR 89,08
Envío por EUR 9,41
Se envía dentro de Estados Unidos de America
Se envía dentro de Estados Unidos de America
Cantidad disponible: 15 disponibles
Imagen del vendedor
The Scepter of Reason : Public Discussion and Political Radicalism in the Origins of Constitutionalism
Librería: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Alemania
Calificación del vendedor: 5 de 5 estrellas
Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - It is not unusual that formal and informal discussions about the political system, its virtues, and its many defects, conclude in a discussion about impartiality. In fact, we all discuss impartiality when we talk about the best way to equally consider all viewpoints. We show our concerns with impartiality when, facing a particular problem, we try to figure out the best solution for all of us, given our conflicting interests. Thus, the quest for impartiality tends to be a common objective for most of us, although we normally disagree on its particular contents. Generally, these formal and informal discussions about impartiality conclude in a dispute between different 'epistemic' conceptions. That is to say, simply, that in these situations we begin to disagree about best procedure to defme the more neutral, impartial solution for all of us.! Basically, trying to answer this question we tend to fluctuate between two opposite positions. According to some, the best way to know which is the more impartial solution is to resort to a process of collective reflection: in those situations we have to consider the opinions of all those who are possibly affected. Nº de ref. del artículo: 9781402002861
Comprar nuevo
EUR 66,40
Envío por EUR 35,00
Se envía de Alemania a Estados Unidos de America
Se envía de Alemania a Estados Unidos de America
Cantidad disponible: 1 disponibles
Imagen del vendedor
The Scepter of Reason
Publicado por
Springer, Springer Nov 2001, 2001
ISBN 10: 1402002866
ISBN 13: 9781402002861
Nuevo
Taschenbuch
Librería: buchversandmimpf2000, Emtmannsberg, BAYE, Alemania
Calificación del vendedor: 5 de 5 estrellas
Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. This item is printed on demand - Print on Demand Titel. Neuware -It is not unusual that formal and informal discussions about the political system, its virtues, and its many defects, conclude in a discussion about impartiality. In fact, we all discuss impartiality when we talk about the best way to equally consider all viewpoints. We show our concerns with impartiality when, facing a particular problem, we try to figure out the best solution for all of us, given our conflicting interests. Thus, the quest for impartiality tends to be a common objective for most of us, although we normally disagree on its particular contents. Generally, these formal and informal discussions about impartiality conclude in a dispute between different 'epistemic' conceptions. That is to say, simply, that in these situations we begin to disagree about best procedure to defme the more neutral, impartial solution for all of us.! Basically, trying to answer this question we tend to fluctuate between two opposite positions. According to some, the best way to know which is the more impartial solution is to resort to a process of collective reflection: in those situations we have to consider the opinions of all those who are possibly affected.Springer-Verlag KG, Sachsenplatz 4-6, 1201 Wien 172 pp. Englisch. Nº de ref. del artículo: 9781402002861
Comprar nuevo
EUR 53,49
Envío por EUR 60,00
Se envía de Alemania a Estados Unidos de America
Se envía de Alemania a Estados Unidos de America
Cantidad disponible: 1 disponibles