Excerpt from Digest of Election Cases: Cases of Contested Elections in the House of Representatives, Forty-Seventh Congress, From 1880 to 1882, Inclusive
Contestant claimed among other things that the vote of a county Should be thrown out because the proper officers failed to give notice of the election, and appoint managers; and that a number of votes were counted for Herbert, contestee, which were spelled Hebert.
About the Publisher
Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com
This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.
Excerpt from Digest of Election Cases: Cases of Contested Elections in the House of Representatives, Forty-Seventh Congress, From 1880 to 1882, Inclusive
As to Escambia County, by the law Of Alabama it is the duty of the sheriff, judge of probate, and clerk of the circuit court to give notice of an election and appoint managers. This duty the sheriff, judge of pro bate, and clerk of the circuit court of Escambia County failed to per form. But by the statutes of Alabama it is provided that when for any cause managers and other officers of election are not appointed, the qualified electors present may elect them. It appears that this was done and the election held; and it further appears that on the 3oth day of October, 1880, the chairman of the Congressional executive committee of the Democratic party gave contestant notice that this course would be pursued, and invited him to name the persons he desired as managers to represent them at the different boxes. Under these circumstances, as the law is well settled that when time and places of holding an elec tion are fixed by law no notice by the Officials is essential, your com mittee can see no good ground upon which to exclude the vote of Escambia County.
This conclusion derives additional weight from the fact that contestant in his notice of contest made no charge against the legality of the elec tion as held in Escambia County.
As to the alleged misnomer in Pike County, your committee find that the evidence does not establish that more than fifty votes were cast in which Mr. Herbert's name was spelled Hebert. They further find that these ballots were intended to be cast for Herbert; that they were printed Hebert by mistake of the printer; that no person of like name except contestee was being voted for or was a candidate, and they be lieve that under the law and the precedents these votes were rightfully counted for contestee. Indeed, Mr. Ingersoll, one Of contestant's coun sel, admits they should be so counted.
If we then restore to contestee his majority in Escambia, 634, and the votes taken from him in Pike, he gains from these two items alone, on the count of Abraham Mayer.
About the Publisher
Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com
This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.
"Sobre este título" puede pertenecer a otra edición de este libro.
GRATIS gastos de envío desde Reino Unido a Estados Unidos de America
Destinos, gastos y plazos de envíoLibrería: Forgotten Books, London, Reino Unido
Paperback. Condición: New. Print on Demand. This book covers 70 contested election cases in the House of Representatives from 1865 to 1890. The book provides a chronological narrative that allows the reader to follow the maturing of contest procedures from the 39th Congress to the 51st Congress. The introduction describes the new procedures that led to the growth of contested election cases during the late 1800s. The appendix contains a comprehensive table of all contested elections before the House in that time period. This book is a reproduction of an important historical work, digitally reconstructed using state-of-the-art technology to preserve the original format. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in the book. print-on-demand item. Nº de ref. del artículo: 9781333015169_0
Cantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles
Librería: PBShop.store US, Wood Dale, IL, Estados Unidos de America
PAP. Condición: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000. Nº de ref. del artículo: LW-9781333015169
Cantidad disponible: 15 disponibles
Librería: PBShop.store UK, Fairford, GLOS, Reino Unido
PAP. Condición: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000. Nº de ref. del artículo: LW-9781333015169
Cantidad disponible: 15 disponibles