Excerpt from Essays on the Apocalypse
I gather from the reviews of my first book on the Apocalypse that it is taken to be the official Ro man view of that Scripture, because the book bears the I mprimamr of the vicar-general of the Diocese of Westminster. This, however, is simply a matter of diocesan official routine. When a loyal Catholic wishes to publish a book dealing more or less with religion, he applies for permission to do so to the Bishop in whose diocese his publishers reside. If the Bishop, in this, case the Archbishop of West minster, agrees to the publication of the' book, he appoints a theologian to read the manuscript of the book and see that it is free from heresy. It the examiner, so appointed, finds that there is no heresy in the book he gives the author a m'hiz-obstat. The author sends this to the vicar-general of the Diocese, and asks for his imprimatur, which is then granted as a matter of course. It does not imply approval of the work, for neither the Vicar General nor the Bishop have so far seen the book. The imprimatur is granted before it is printed. Unless the book has singular merits it very probably troubles the Church no more. Rome, in the mean while, hasnever heard of the book, and,,possibly, never will. Official Rome, I mean the church, sweeps majestically on with the centuries, taking little note of exegetics which do not survive her heroic tests of time and criticism.
About the Publisher
Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com
This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.
"Sinopsis" puede pertenecer a otra edición de este libro.
Librería: Forgotten Books, London, Reino Unido
Paperback. Condición: New. Print on Demand. This text focuses on the controversy over the authorship and date of the writing of The Book of Revelation. In the first century, many doubted its authenticity, attributing it to another John due to its stylistic differences from the Gospel of John. Nevertheless, the text argues that the Revelation was written by John the Evangelist likely toward the close of Nero's reign (67 A.D.), and not Domitian's as traditionally thought. It places the book within the context of John's life, describing his exile to Patmos and his subsequent return to Ephesus, where he is said to have written his Gospel long after the Revelation. The author supports their claims with detailed analysis of the historical record, exploring the linguistic and thematic similarities between the two works. By doing so, the text sheds light on the complex history of early Christian literature and reinforces the significance of the Revelation as a work of profound spiritual and historical value. This book is a reproduction of an important historical work, digitally reconstructed using state-of-the-art technology to preserve the original format. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in the book. print-on-demand item. Nº de ref. del artículo: 9781331214069_0
Cantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles
Librería: PBShop.store US, Wood Dale, IL, Estados Unidos de America
PAP. Condición: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000. Nº de ref. del artículo: LW-9781331214069
Cantidad disponible: 15 disponibles
Librería: PBShop.store UK, Fairford, GLOS, Reino Unido
PAP. Condición: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000. Nº de ref. del artículo: LW-9781331214069
Cantidad disponible: 15 disponibles