Sinopsis
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1894 Excerpt: ... the strong verb. The following is a summary and explanation of the forms affected: 1. Where a simple vocal Sheva would stand under the first radical, e.g. inf. cons. or iinpv. 2 rnasc. sing., the guttural requires (§ 53 (3) (a)) a compound, or Chateph, Sheva; this is generally-=-; but with Aleph, frequently--. 2. Where a preformative comes before the first radical, so that in the regular verb Sheva would close the first syllable; e.g. in the impf. Qal, pft. Niph., and throughout Hiph. and Hoph., there either will be found a closed syllable, as xxvi. 18, "ln""! vuy-yach-por; or more frequently there is found under the first radical a compound Sheva containing the vowel under the preformative, and giving rise to the following groups as seen in the Paradigm: (1) In Qal--i. If the second syllable has 0, _.,_. ii. If the second syllable has a, the group is...,..; as xli. 56, pT)l!'1 vayyS-cli'z&q; the inflexion being regular. (2) In Niph.,...... in pft. and partcp. (3) In Hiph.,-5--in pft.; in other parts..,. (4) In Hoph.,---. 3. When, in consequence of the addition of one of the afformatives 1--n, or of a suffix, the vowel of the syllable which follows a Chateph group, as just described, is reduced to vocal Sheva, two vocal (§ 15) Rhevas would stand together, contrary to the law of the language. To avoid this, the compound Sheva is changed into the full vowel which lies in the Chateph, and which then stands in a half-open syllable (§ 48). Thus "rfcjrn, but "npyn ta-'a-m-dto. 4. In those parts of Niph. where the first radical is usually doubled the Dagesh is omitted (§ 53 (1)); but compensation is made by lengthening Chireq to Tsere. This applies to verbs which begin with Resh; but in other respects they are conj...
"Sinopsis" puede pertenecer a otra edición de este libro.
Reseña del editor
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1894 Excerpt: ... the strong verb. The following is a summary and explanation of the forms affected: 1. Where a simple vocal Sheva would stand under the first radical, e.g. inf. cons. or iinpv. 2 rnasc. sing., the guttural requires (§ 53 (3) (a)) a compound, or Chateph, Sheva; this is generally-=-; but with Aleph, frequently--. 2. Where a preformative comes before the first radical, so that in the regular verb Sheva would close the first syllable; e.g. in the impf. Qal, pft. Niph., and throughout Hiph. and Hoph., there either will be found a closed syllable, as xxvi. 18, "ln""! vuy-yach-por; or more frequently there is found under the first radical a compound Sheva containing the vowel under the preformative, and giving rise to the following groups as seen in the Paradigm: (1) In Qal--i. If the second syllable has 0, _.,_. ii. If the second syllable has a, the group is...,..; as xli. 56, pT)l!'1 vayyS-cli'z&q; the inflexion being regular. (2) In Niph.,...... in pft. and partcp. (3) In Hiph.,-5--in pft.; in other parts..,. (4) In Hoph.,---. 3. When, in consequence of the addition of one of the afformatives 1--n, or of a suffix, the vowel of the syllable which follows a Chateph group, as just described, is reduced to vocal Sheva, two vocal (§ 15) Rhevas would stand together, contrary to the law of the language. To avoid this, the compound Sheva is changed into the full vowel which lies in the Chateph, and which then stands in a half-open syllable (§ 48). Thus "rfcjrn, but "npyn ta-'a-m-dto. 4. In those parts of Niph. where the first radical is usually doubled the Dagesh is omitted (§ 53 (1)); but compensation is made by lengthening Chireq to Tsere. This applies to verbs which begin with Resh; but in other respects they are conj...
"Sobre este título" puede pertenecer a otra edición de este libro.
