This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1904 Excerpt: ... kind. '.-. / The CHAIRMAN: Thank you.',.( i.:.: (The Witness withdrew.);'.'. i i:..... i Mr. THOMAS DUER13IN DUTTON, called and Examined... 1394. The CHAIRMAN: You are a solicitor?f-Yesi my. Mr. T. D. Button. Lord. 1395. I think you acted for the prisoner during the proceedings' before the magistrate on the trial in 1896. and subsequently after that trial?--Yes. 1396. I think you did not act for him in the last trial, in 1904?--No, I did not, my Lord. 1397. Perhaps the shortest way in this matter would be to ask you to read or have read the statement that you have yourself prepared?--I Oct. Mnd,.1904. ipas first instructed on the 17th December, 1895. On that day Beck was--remanded in custody until December 23rd. On that day two women were Mr. T. D. Dutton. calle(I, an(i Sergeant Watts and a police-constable. Sergeant Watts Admitted in cross-examination that four other women had attended that morning to identify Beck, but had failed. Beck was again remanded in custody until December 30th. On that day no evidence was taken, and he was remanded for a week. 1398. I think you have made a note of what Sergeant Watts said?--Yes, my Lord. 1399. You had better state it?--"Four other women have been brought forward to identify the prisoner, and although they believe he is the man they will not swear to him." Those are the actual words. Then Beck was remanded until January 2nd, 1896. On December 31st I wrote to the solicitor to the Treasury as follows: "Dear Sir, I shall be glad if you wilj give me an opportunity of inspecting the documents in the handwriting of the prisoner which you have handed to Mr. Gurrin, the expert, for the purpose of comparison with the original documents. Although I have written to Mr. Gurrin to supply me with a copy of his re...
"Sinopsis" puede pertenecer a otra edición de este libro.
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1904 Excerpt: ... kind. '.-. / The CHAIRMAN: Thank you.',.( i.:.: (The Witness withdrew.);'.'. i i:..... i Mr. THOMAS DUER13IN DUTTON, called and Examined... 1394. The CHAIRMAN: You are a solicitor?f-Yesi my. Mr. T. D. Button. Lord. 1395. I think you acted for the prisoner during the proceedings' before the magistrate on the trial in 1896. and subsequently after that trial?--Yes. 1396. I think you did not act for him in the last trial, in 1904?--No, I did not, my Lord. 1397. Perhaps the shortest way in this matter would be to ask you to read or have read the statement that you have yourself prepared?--I Oct. Mnd,.1904. ipas first instructed on the 17th December, 1895. On that day Beck was--remanded in custody until December 23rd. On that day two women were Mr. T. D. Dutton. calle(I, an(i Sergeant Watts and a police-constable. Sergeant Watts Admitted in cross-examination that four other women had attended that morning to identify Beck, but had failed. Beck was again remanded in custody until December 30th. On that day no evidence was taken, and he was remanded for a week. 1398. I think you have made a note of what Sergeant Watts said?--Yes, my Lord. 1399. You had better state it?--"Four other women have been brought forward to identify the prisoner, and although they believe he is the man they will not swear to him." Those are the actual words. Then Beck was remanded until January 2nd, 1896. On December 31st I wrote to the solicitor to the Treasury as follows: "Dear Sir, I shall be glad if you wilj give me an opportunity of inspecting the documents in the handwriting of the prisoner which you have handed to Mr. Gurrin, the expert, for the purpose of comparison with the original documents. Although I have written to Mr. Gurrin to supply me with a copy of his re...
"Sobre este título" puede pertenecer a otra edición de este libro.