Caroline Henckels examines how investment tribunals should balance competing state and investor interests in determining state liability in regulatory disputes.
"Sinopsis" puede pertenecer a otra edición de este libro.
Caroline Henckels is Senior Lecturer in Law at Monash University, Melbourne, and was previously Vice-Chancellor's Postdoctoral Research Fellow in Law at the University of New South Wales, Sydney.
"Sobre este título" puede pertenecer a otra edición de este libro.
Librería: California Books, Miami, FL, Estados Unidos de America
Condición: New. Nº de ref. del artículo: I-9781107087903
Cantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles
Librería: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Reino Unido
Condición: New. In English. Nº de ref. del artículo: ria9781107087903_new
Cantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles
Librería: THE SAINT BOOKSTORE, Southport, Reino Unido
Hardback. Condición: New. This item is printed on demand. New copy - Usually dispatched within 5-9 working days. Nº de ref. del artículo: C9781107087903
Cantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles
Librería: CitiRetail, Stevenage, Reino Unido
Hardcover. Condición: new. Hardcover. In this study, Caroline Henckels examines how investment tribunals have balanced the competing interests of host states and foreign investors in determining state liability in disputes concerning the exercise of public power. Analyzing the concepts of proportionality and deference in investment tribunals' decision-making in comparative perspective, the book proposes a new methodology for investment tribunals to adopt in regulatory disputes, which combines proportionality analysis with an institutionally sensitive approach to the standard of review. Henckels argues that adopting a modified form of proportionality analysis would provide a means for tribunals to decide cases in a more consistent and coherent manner leading to greater certainty for both states and investors, and that affording due deference to host states in the determination of liability would address the concern that the decisions of investment tribunals unjustifiably impact on the regulatory autonomy of states. Investment treaty arbitration urgently requires a certain and consistent way of deciding regulatory disputes that pays due respect to the competing imperatives of investment protection and regulatory autonomy. Caroline Henckels argues that in such cases investment tribunals should employ proportionality analysis in combination with an institutionally sensitive standard of review. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from our UK warehouse or from our Australian or US warehouses, depending on stock availability. Nº de ref. del artículo: 9781107087903
Cantidad disponible: 1 disponibles
Librería: moluna, Greven, Alemania
Condición: New. Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. Investment treaty arbitration urgently requires a certain and consistent way of deciding regulatory disputes that pays due respect to the competing imperatives of investment protection and regulatory autonomy. Caroline Henckels argues that in such cases inv. Nº de ref. del artículo: 33845426
Cantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles
Librería: Revaluation Books, Exeter, Reino Unido
Hardcover. Condición: Brand New. 200 pages. 9.25x6.25x1.00 inches. In Stock. Nº de ref. del artículo: x-1107087902
Cantidad disponible: 2 disponibles
Librería: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Alemania
Buch. Condición: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - In this study, Caroline Henckels examines how investment tribunals have balanced the competing interests of host states and foreign investors in determining state liability in disputes concerning the exercise of public power. Analyzing the concepts of proportionality and deference in investment tribunals' decision-making in comparative perspective, the book proposes a new methodology for investment tribunals to adopt in regulatory disputes, which combines proportionality analysis with an institutionally sensitive approach to the standard of review. Henckels argues that adopting a modified form of proportionality analysis would provide a means for tribunals to decide cases in a more consistent and coherent manner leading to greater certainty for both states and investors, and that affording due deference to host states in the determination of liability would address the concern that the decisions of investment tribunals unjustifiably impact on the regulatory autonomy of states. Nº de ref. del artículo: 9781107087903
Cantidad disponible: 1 disponibles
Librería: preigu, Osnabrück, Alemania
Buch. Condición: Neu. Proportionality and Deference in Investor-State Arbitration | Caroline Henckels | Buch | Gebunden | Englisch | 2015 | Cambridge University Press | EAN 9781107087903 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: Libri GmbH, Europaallee 1, 36244 Bad Hersfeld, gpsr[at]libri[dot]de | Anbieter: preigu Print on Demand. Nº de ref. del artículo: 108795492
Cantidad disponible: 5 disponibles
Librería: Kennys Bookstore, Olney, MD, Estados Unidos de America
Condición: New. Caroline Henckels examines how investment tribunals should balance competing state and investor interests in determining state liability in regulatory disputes. Series: Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law. Num Pages: 266 pages, black & white illustrations. BIC Classification: JPS; LBBM; LNAC5. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational. Dimension: 228 x 152 x 16. Weight in Grams: 530. . 2015. Hardcover. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland. Nº de ref. del artículo: V9781107087903
Cantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles
Librería: Mispah books, Redhill, SURRE, Reino Unido
Hardcover. Condición: Like New. LIKE NEW. SHIPS FROM MULTIPLE LOCATIONS. book. Nº de ref. del artículo: ERICA77311070879026
Cantidad disponible: 1 disponibles