Assume one has to estimate the mean J x P( dx) (or the median of P, or any other functional t;;(P)) on the basis ofi.i.d. observations from P. Ifnothing is known about P, then the sample mean is certainly the best estimator one can think of. If P is known to be the member of a certain parametric family, say {Po: {) E e}, one can usually do better by estimating {) first, say by {)(n)(.~.), and using J XPo(n)(;r.) (dx) as an estimate for J xPo(dx). There is an "intermediate" range, where we know something about the unknown probability measure P, but less than parametric theory takes for granted. Practical problems have always led statisticians to invent estimators for such intermediate models, but it usually remained open whether these estimators are nearly optimal or not. There was one exception: The case of "adaptivity", where a "nonparametric" estimate exists which is asymptotically optimal for any parametric submodel. The standard (and for a long time only) example of such a fortunate situation was the estimation of the center of symmetry for a distribution of unknown shape.
"Sinopsis" puede pertenecer a otra edición de este libro.
Assume one has to estimate the mean J x P( dx) (or the median of P, or any other functional t;;(P)) on the basis ofi.i.d. observations from P. Ifnothing is known about P, then the sample mean is certainly the best estimator one can think of. If P is known to be the member of a certain parametric family, say {Po: {) E e}, one can usually do better by estimating {) first, say by {)(n)(.~.), and using J XPo(n)(;r.) (dx) as an estimate for J xPo(dx). There is an "intermediate" range, where we know something about the unknown probability measure P, but less than parametric theory takes for granted. Practical problems have always led statisticians to invent estimators for such intermediate models, but it usually remained open whether these estimators are nearly optimal or not. There was one exception: The case of "adaptivity", where a "nonparametric" estimate exists which is asymptotically optimal for any parametric submodel. The standard (and for a long time only) example of such a fortunate situation was the estimation of the center of symmetry for a distribution of unknown shape.
"Sobre este título" puede pertenecer a otra edición de este libro.
EUR 28,80 gastos de envío desde Reino Unido a Estados Unidos de America
Destinos, gastos y plazos de envíoEUR 6,81 gastos de envío en Estados Unidos de America
Destinos, gastos y plazos de envíoLibrería: Best Price, Torrance, CA, Estados Unidos de America
Condición: New. SUPER FAST SHIPPING. Nº de ref. del artículo: 9780387972381
Cantidad disponible: 1 disponibles
Librería: Lucky's Textbooks, Dallas, TX, Estados Unidos de America
Condición: New. Nº de ref. del artículo: ABLIING23Feb2215580174989
Cantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles
Librería: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Reino Unido
Condición: New. In. Nº de ref. del artículo: ria9780387972381_new
Cantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles
Librería: Chiron Media, Wallingford, Reino Unido
PF. Condición: New. Nº de ref. del artículo: 6666-IUK-9780387972381
Cantidad disponible: 10 disponibles
Librería: BuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K., Bergisch Gladbach, Alemania
Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -Assume one has to estimate the mean J x P( dx) (or the median of P, or any other functional t;;(P)) on the basis ofi.i.d. observations from P. Ifnothing is known about P, then the sample mean is certainly the best estimator one can think of. If P is known to be the member of a certain parametric family, say {Po: {) E e}, one can usually do better by estimating {) first, say by {)(n)(.~.), and using J XPo(n)(;r.) (dx) as an estimate for J xPo(dx). There is an 'intermediate' range, where we know something about the unknown probability measure P, but less than parametric theory takes for granted. Practical problems have always led statisticians to invent estimators for such intermediate models, but it usually remained open whether these estimators are nearly optimal or not. There was one exception: The case of 'adaptivity', where a 'nonparametric' estimate exists which is asymptotically optimal for any parametric submodel. The standard (and for a long time only) example of such a fortunate situation was the estimation of the center of symmetry for a distribution of unknown shape. 120 pp. Englisch. Nº de ref. del artículo: 9780387972381
Cantidad disponible: 2 disponibles
Librería: Books Puddle, New York, NY, Estados Unidos de America
Condición: New. pp. iii + 112 Softcover Reprint of the Original 1st Edition. Nº de ref. del artículo: 263874683
Cantidad disponible: 4 disponibles
Librería: THE SAINT BOOKSTORE, Southport, Reino Unido
Paperback / softback. Condición: New. This item is printed on demand. New copy - Usually dispatched within 5-9 working days 240. Nº de ref. del artículo: C9780387972381
Cantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles
Librería: Majestic Books, Hounslow, Reino Unido
Condición: New. Print on Demand pp. iii + 112. Nº de ref. del artículo: 5021860
Cantidad disponible: 4 disponibles
Librería: Biblios, Frankfurt am main, HESSE, Alemania
Condición: New. PRINT ON DEMAND pp. iii + 112. Nº de ref. del artículo: 183874673
Cantidad disponible: 4 disponibles
Librería: moluna, Greven, Alemania
Condición: New. Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. Assume one has to estimate the mean J x P( dx) (or the median of P, or any other functional t(P)) on the basis ofi.i.d. observations from P. Ifnothing is known about P, then the sample mean is certainly the best estimator one can think of. If P is known t. Nº de ref. del artículo: 5912957
Cantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles