The Anatomy of Antiliberalism - Tapa dura

Holmes challenges the philosophical arguments of the high communitarians...and their intellectual forebears. By the time he is finished, the opposing camp has no survivors, ancient or modern. Anybody who feels drawn to the high communitarian cause owes it to himself (though not to society) to read Mr. Holmes's book; everybody else should read it for pleasure. Holmes' purpose is both to define the antiliberal traditon and to defend liberalism against it. The result is a book that sheds a good deal of light on the idea of liberty, mainly through the author's vigorous and well-informed polemic...The book is rich in insights and ideas, all of which contribute to the overwhelming impression the reader is likely to derive from the book: that liberalism is not weak and one-sided but rather takes into account...a wide range of fundamental human needs and desires. The liberalism sketched by Holmes is not easily relativized in either radical or conservative terms.--Glenn Tinder "The Atlantic " Holmes is a brilliant polemicist and a sparkling writer...The chapters [he] devotes to dead and hard opponents of liberalism are only a warm-up for his zestfully nasty attacks on soft and living opponents of liberalism...Surely the ideas being discussed here should get people angry and are worth fighting about.--Alan Wolfe "New Republic " This book is an act of political engagement, a defense in clear and bracing language of liberal ideas...This book is [Holmes's] contribution to the present debate on an important question in American cultural life: whether liberal individualism in the United States has undermined moral commitment to community and the common good.--Gilbert Allardyce "American Historical Review "

"Liberal", spoken in a certain tone, summons up permissiveness, materialism, rootlessness, scepticism, and relativism run rampant. How has the grand democratic ideal come to be a dirty word? This book aims to shows what antiliberalism means in the modern world; where it comes from, whom it serves, and why it speaks with such a forceful, ever-changing voice. In the past, Marxism has been liberalism's best known and most vociferous opponent. But with the fall of Communism, the voices of ethnic particularism, communitarianism, and religious fundamentalism (a tradition Holmes traces to Joseph de Maistre) have become louder in rejection of the Enlightenment, failing to distinguish between the descendants of Marx and Adam Smith. Stephen Holmes uses the tools of the political theorist and the intellectual historian to expose the philosophical underpinnings of antiliberalism in its non-Marxist mode. Examining the works of some of liberalism's severest critics (including Maistre, Carl Schmitt, Leo Strauss, and Alasdair Maclntyre), Holmes offers a reader's guide to antiliberal culture in its various guises. As much a mindset as a theory, as much a sensibility as an argument, antiliberalism appears here in its diverse efforts to pit "spiritual truths" and "communal bonds" against a perceived cultural decay and moral disintegration. This corrosion of the social fabric is what the antiliberals see as the core of liberal politics, rather than the separation of powers, competitive elections, a free press, religious tolerance, public budgets, and judicial controls on the police. Against this picture, Holmes outlines the classic liberal arguments which, he argues, are most often misrepresented by the enemies of liberalism, and most essential to the future of democracy. Striving to be constructive as well as critical, this book explores the nature of liberalism, and why it must and always will engender deep misgivings along with passionate commitment.