American And English Corporation Cases, Volume 32. N° de ref. de la librería
Sinopsis: This is a reproduction of a book published before 1923. This book may have occasional imperfections
such as missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. that were either part of the original artifact,
or were introduced by the scanning process. We believe this work is culturally important, and despite the imperfections,
have elected to bring it back into print as part of our continuing commitment to the preservation of printed works
worldwide. We appreciate your understanding of the imperfections in the preservation process, and hope you enjoy this valuable book.
The below data was compiled from various identification fields in the bibliographic record of this title. This data is provided as an additional tool in helping to ensure edition identification:
American And English Corporation Cases, Volume 32; American And English Corporation Cases
Título: American And English Corporation Cases, ...
Condición del libro: Good
Descripción RareBooksClub. Paperback. Estado de conservación: New. This item is printed on demand. Paperback. 356 pages. Dimensions: 9.7in. x 7.4in. x 0.7in.This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1891 Excerpt: . . . shall contain more than one subject, which shall be clearly expressed in its title, is mandatory upon the city council. According y an ordinance of a city of the second class, the title to which clearly indicates and the ordinance actually contains two separate and distinct subjects, having no necessary connection with each other, is void in talo from that fact, and without reference to any other or further questions. Same-Same--Court Will Declare Ordinance Void. --When it manifestly appears both from the title and body of such an ordinance, that it coritains two separate, independent, and distinct subjects of legislation, this court will not inquire whether one is without and the other within the power of the city council, nor will it investigate whether or not one subject was used to induce the passage of the other. but it will give to section 9 of the act, to incorporate cities of the second class, its clearly expressed meaning, that no city ordinance shall contain more than one subject, and, if it does, it violates this provision, and is void for that reason alone. Coiv1MissioNERs decision. Error from Wyandotte County District Court. Waggener, 11artin 65 Orr, for plaintiff in error. W. S. Carroll, for defendant in error. SIMPSON, C. --The Missouri Pacific Railway Company commenced this action in the district court of Vyandotte county, to restrain the public authorities ofthe city of Vy-G an d andotte from the collectionof taxes levied upon a m certain tract of land owned by the railway com any that it is claimed is not within the limits of the city. fan the year 1885 the mayor and council of the city of Vyandotte, on the theory that this land was within its corporate limits, levied thereon certain city taxes, as follows: General reven. . . This item ships from La Vergne,TN. Paperback. Nº de ref. de la librería 9781153634885