tchernichewsky n g (4 resultados)

Couverture rigide. Condición: Très bon. Edition originale. Traduction et notice biographique de Mme Laran-Tamarkine. In-12° relié demi-chagrin de l'époque, plats de couverture conservés, XXVI + 265 pages. Charnières un peu frottés sans dommage. le dos est insolé mais l'exemplaire magnifique. Belle étude sur la propriété.

XXVI, 265 S., 2 Bll. 8°, illustr. Orig.-Broschur. Ètudes sur le devenir social, IX. - Die erste französische Ausgabe erschien 1903 (vgl. Catalogue général de la librairie française 1900-1905, Bd. 19, hrsg. v. D. Jordell, Paris 1909, S. 682). - Aus dem Russischen ins Französische übersetzt von [Eugénie] Laran-Tamarkine. - Der Buchhändler und sozialistische Verleger Rivière war einer der ersten, der ab 1910 die Nouvelle Revue française verkaufte. Er ließ seine Veröffentlichungen bei der Arbeitergenossenschafts-Buchdruckerei Villeneuve-St-Georges drucken, was auch im vorl. Exemplar auf der Broschur-Rückseite vermerkt ist. 1920 war Rivière Gründungsmitglied der Zeitschrift Le Bouquiniste français , Organ der franz. Buchhandels-Gewerkschaft. (Vgl. Richard Lebaron, La librairie Marcel Rivière entre science, économie et politique, in: Les Cahiers du Centre de Recherches Historiques, Paris 2003, Online-Zugriff am 15.02.2022.) - Mit Exlibris aus dem Vorsatz. - Unbeschnittenes u. teils unaufgeschnittenes Exemplar. - Broschur mit starken Gebrauchsspuren, ordentliches Exemplar. 500 gr.

Reliure. Condición: Très bon. 1 volume reliure toilée noire ancienne, dos lisse titré en lettres dorées, avec en queue: Cercle de la Libératrice, XXVI et 265 pages [1]. Traduction et notice biographique de Mme Laran-Tamarkine. Nikolaï Gavrilovitch Tchernychevski, Saratov 1828-1889, philosophe, socialiste utopiste et révolutionnaire russe. Collection '' Etudes socialistes '', XI. Rare. Bon exemplaire ( Photographies sur demande / We can send pictures of this book on simple request ) Size: in 12 (18x11,5).

Paris, M. Rivière, 1911. (4), 26, 265, (3) pp. 8vo. Modern half morocco, raised bands with gilt lettering, marbled boards, original covers preserved (Études sur le devenir social, IX). Zaleski, i, 469; Stammhammer, iii, p. 331. Second French edition. Includes the famous Lettres sans Adresse.'Herzen created Populism; Chernyshevski was its politician. He provided Populism with its most solid content, and not only gave it ideas but inspired its main course of action. This course was modified during the 'sixties and 'seventies, but it undoubtedly originated in the short but brilliant publicizing activities undertaken by Chernyshevsky between 1853 and 1862' (Franco Venturi, Roots of Revolution, chapter 5).The author was born in 1829 and he was mainly active around the period of the reforms by Alexander II around 1860. He worked for the journal "Sovremenik" (the Contemporary) which was founded in 1847 among others by Nekrassoff. It is in this journal that he introduces the work of John Stuart Mill: in 1869 he published the first part of Mill's work to which he adds notes and comments. He also wrote political reviews and mainly through his inspiration and energy the journal became a voice of the opposition, reason why Tourgeneff had already stopped working for the journal. While his initial inspiration was Hegel, although he became acquinted with his thought through reading Feuerbach, he steadily became more and more inspired by the French anarchist P.-J. Proudhon. Tchernichewsky belonged more to the socialist tradition as was common before 1850; he was no adherent of Marx. During the revolutionary troubles in 1861 in Petersburg, Tchernichewsky was arrested and placed in the Peter-Pauls prison where he stayed for two years and where he wrote his famous book What's to be done. He was exiled to Siberia in 1864 where he stayed to 1884. Shortly after his release he died, in 1889, at the age of 60, of which he had spent 23 years in prison and exile.The present work is a reply to the liberal economists who claimed that with the abolition of servitude the communal ownership of the soil would dissappear. Tchernichewsky, who stood sympathetic to the institution of communal ownership, opposes this thesis. The basis of the reforms of 1861 was to maintain this ancient institution of communal ownership.