Publicado por FinanzBuch Verlag, München, 2007
ISBN 10: 3898792943 ISBN 13: 9783898792943
Librería: Buch- und Kunsthandlung Wilms Am Markt Wilms e.K., Bad Bergzabern, Alemania
Original o primera edición
Hardcover. Condición: Sehr gut. Estado de la sobrecubierta: Sehr gut. 1. Auflage. Schönes, sauberes Exemplar. - Einband: Leinen gebunden mit Schutzumschlag - Buchseiten: ca. 223.
Publicado por FinanzBuch Verlag, 2007
ISBN 10: 3898792943 ISBN 13: 9783898792943
Librería: Studibuch, Stuttgart, Alemania
hardcover. Condición: Gut. 256 Seiten; 9783898792943.3 Sprache: Deutsch Gewicht in Gramm: 1.
Publicado por Peter Lang, 2002
ISBN 10: 3631397666 ISBN 13: 9783631397664
Librería: Librairie La Canopee. Inc., Saint-Armand, QC, Canada
Condición: AS NEW. État de NEUF / AS NEW condition 3631397666 9783631397664 1 BP103.
Publicado por Peter Lang Ltd. International Academic Publishers Sep 2002, 2002
ISBN 10: 3631397666 ISBN 13: 9783631397664
Librería: BuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K., Bergisch Gladbach, Alemania
Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -Why is it that people are often inclined to accept irrational arguments or to reject rational ones It is, the author argues, because discussions in everyday life are both dialectical - conducted with the best possible solution in mind - and rhetorical - organized by the interactors in the form of a discursive event. By combining argumentation theoretical and discourse analytical insights and revisiting ancient and medieval rhetoric and dialectics, this study transcends the assumption of a symmetrical communicative situation in which only 'good' arguments matter. It redefines dialectical concepts, e.g., acceptability or conclusiveness, from a rhetorical and dialogic perspective and is thereby able to address colloquial speech arguing as the inherently asymmetrical discursive event it is. 336 pp. Englisch.
Publicado por Peter Lang, 2002
ISBN 10: 3631397666 ISBN 13: 9783631397664
Librería: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Alemania
Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - Why is it that people are often inclined to accept irrational arguments or to reject rational ones It is, the author argues, because discussions in everyday life are both dialectical - conducted with the best possible solution in mind - and rhetorical - organized by the interactors in the form of a discursive event. By combining argumentation theoretical and discourse analytical insights and revisiting ancient and medieval rhetoric and dialectics, this study transcends the assumption of a symmetrical communicative situation in which only 'good' arguments matter. It redefines dialectical concepts, e.g., acceptability or conclusiveness, from a rhetorical and dialogic perspective and is thereby able to address colloquial speech arguing as the inherently asymmetrical discursive event it is.