On the Social Utility of Psychopathology: Deviant Majority and Its Keepers? - Tapa dura

-This work is recommended reading for those who have some familiarity with clinical psychology and the historical treatment of those whose actions are viewed as bizarre. . . . [T]he book provides a stimulating, provocative, and entertaining overview of the contemporary role of psychiatry and how its practitioners, like the Inquisitors of medieval Europe, serve very discernible political ends.- --Thomas Gabor, Contemporary Sociology -The format moves one along; the overview of historical evolution of the concept of -deviancy- and -treatment- is well done. ... I resonate to the ironies portrayed so effectively in pointing up the shifting cultural definitions of -deviate- and -keeper.-- --Wil-liam Schofield, author of Psy-chotherapy -Acontribution to fostering a needed paradigm revolution. ... Very good ideas that have not been expressed elsewhere.- -- James C. Mancuso, coauthor of Schizophrenia "This work is recommended reading for those who have some familiarity with clinical psychology and the historical treatment of those whose actions are viewed as bizarre. . . . [T]he book provides a stimulating, provocative, and entertaining overview of the contemporary role of psychiatry and how its practitioners, like the Inquisitors of medieval Europe, serve very discernible political ends." --Thomas Gabor, Contemporary Sociology "The format moves one along; the overview of historical evolution of the concept of "deviancy" and "treatment" is well done. ... I resonate to the ironies portrayed so effectively in pointing up the shifting cultural definitions of "deviate" and "keeper."" --Wil-liam Schofield, author of Psy-chotherapy "Acontribution to fostering a needed paradigm revolution. ... Very good ideas that have not been expressed elsewhere." -- James C. Mancuso, coauthor of Schizophrenia "This work is recommended reading for those who have some familiarity with clinical psychology and the historical treatment of those whose actions are viewed as bizarre. . . . [T]he book provides a stimulating, provocative, and entertaining overview of the contemporary role of psychiatry and how its practitioners, like the Inquisitors of medieval Europe, serve very discernible political ends." --Thomas Gabor, Contemporary Sociology "The format moves one along; the overview of historical evolution of the concept of "deviancy" and "treatment" is well done. ... I resonate to the ironies portrayed so effectively in pointing up the shifting cultural definitions of "deviate" and "keeper."" --Wil-liam Schofield, author of Psy-chotherapy "Acontribution to fostering a needed paradigm revolution. ... Very good ideas that have not been expressed elsewhere." -- James C. Mancuso, coauthor of Schizophrenia "The format moves one along; the overview of historical evolution of the concept of "deviancy" and "treatment" is well done. ... I resonate to the ironies portrayed so effectively in pointing up the shifting cultural definitions of "deviate" and "keeper."" --Wil-liam Schofield, author of Psy-chotherapy "Acontribution to fostering a needed paradigm revolution. ... Very good ideas that have not been expressed elsewhere." -- James C. Mancuso, coauthor of Schizophrenia

Nathaniel Pallone argues that, whatever else is true of psycho-pathology, it serves purposes which are socially useful. What­ever else is true of its clinical treatment, such treatment func­tions as a form of social regula­tion. In societal terms, such treat­ment may serve purposes quite other than the relief of psycho­logical disease or even the remedy of psychological disorder. If psychopathology had not emerged naturally, society might have needed to engender psychopathogenic conditions both to fulfill so­cially useful purposes and to elicit that subtle mechanism for social regulation we term "psychother­apy." Pallone constructs his ar­gument by summing up the evi­dence for two points which apply to all psychotherapeutic practice: that the relief of psychopathology is in no dependable way associ­ated with psychotherapeutic treatment; and that in all schools of psychotherapy, the only clear-cut criterion for terminating treatment is the limit of the pa­tient's financial resources.What surprised me in this manu­script is the stark simplicity with which Pallone constructs his ar­gument [that] society acquires the license to create unlimited [psy­chological] disease, to define this disease as intolerable, to finance armies of disease alleviators providing 'treatments' that are in even more profound contradic­tion with each other than were the religions of old.... The illustra­tion[s] make Pallone's argument crystal clear. - Ivan Illich, from the Preface