ludwig wittgenstein half truths one and a half truths de hintikka jaakko (30 resultados)

hardcover. Condición: Good. Connecting readers with great books since 1972! Used textbooks may not include companion materials such as access codes, etc. May have some wear or writing/highlighting. We ship orders daily and Customer Service is our top priority!

Hard cover. Condición: Very good. No jacket. The book is in great condition with no visible flaws apart from some light handling wear. Binding is tight and inside is clean and unmarked.

paperback. Condición: Very Good. Paperback. Clean and solid. Ships from a smoke-free home.

24,5 x 17 cm. Condición: Gut. 1. Auflage. XIV, 353 Seiten Innen sehr sauberer, guter Zustand. Blauer Ledereinband, mit den üblichen Bibliotheks-Markierungen, Stempeln und Einträgen, innen wie außen, siehe Bilder. (Ein Kleberrest eines abgelösten Bibliotheksschilds auf dem Rückendeckel unten). Sonst sehr gutes Bibliotheksexemplar. - Jaakko Hintikka Selected Papers, Volume/Band 1. B04-01-02C|A79 Sprache: Englisch Gewicht in Gramm: 816.

paperback. Condición: Very Good. Signed by author on title page. Clean and sound copy.

Hardcover. Condición: new. Hardcover. Frequently, a genuine understanding of a thinker's ideas is possible only by following them further than he did himself. Wittgenstein's Viennese contemporary Karl Kraus spoke in a similar context of one-and-a-half truths in contradistinction to half-truths. In this volume of essays, Jaakko Hintikka examines the two grand visions concerning the interrelations of language, self and the world that guided Wittgenstein's thought at the different stages of his philosophical development. He seeks to show how one of them, the so-called picture theory of language, was in reality a combination of several independent assumptions, while the other, the idea of language-games as the vehicles of meaning, was the end product of an intriguing development. Hintikka asserts that many of Wittgenstein's best-known ideas can, and must, be understood as defences or rationalizations of his overall visions. In several essays, Wittgenstein's ideas are illuminated through comparisons with other philosophers, including Russell, Husserl and Carnap. Wittgenstein was far too impatient to explain in his books and book drafts what his problems were, what it was that he was trying to get clear about. For one important instance, in The Brown Book, Wittgenstein had explained in some detail what name-object relationships amount to in his view. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability.

Condición: New.

Condición: New.

Condición: New.

Hardcover. Condición: New. In shrink wrap. Looks like an interesting title!

Condición: New.

Condición: New. In.

Condición: New. In.

Condición: New.

Condición: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Condición: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. Ludwig Wittgenstein: Half-Truths and One-and-a-Half-Truths | Jaakko Hintikka | Taschenbuch | xiv | Englisch | 1996 | Springer | EAN 9780792342809 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: Springer Verlag GmbH, Tiergartenstr. 17, 69121 Heidelberg, juergen[dot]hartmann[at]springer[dot]com | Anbieter: preigu.

Buch. Condición: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - IF WITI'GENSTEIN COULD TALK, COULD WE UNDERSTAND HIM Perusing the secondary literature on Wittgenstein, I have frequently experienced a perfect Brechtean Entfremdungseffekt. This is interesting, I have felt like saying when reading books and papers on Wittgenstein, but who is the writer talking about Certainly not Ludwig Wittgenstein the actual person who wrote his books and not Elektronisches Buch and whom I happened to meet. Why is there this strange gap between the ideas of the actual philosopher and the musings of his interpreters Wittgenstein is talking to us through the posthumous publication of his writings. Why don't philosophers understand what he is saying A partial reason is outlined in the first essay of this volume. Wittgenstein was far too impatient to explain in his books and book drafts what his problems were, what it was that he was trying to get clear about. He was even too impatient to explain in full his earlier solutions, often merely referring to them casually as it were ina shorthand notation. For one important instance, in The Brown Book, Wittgenstein had explained in some detail what name-object relationships amount to in his view. There he offers both an explanation of what his problem is and an account of his own view illustrated by means of specific examples of language-games. But when he raises the same question again in Philosophical Investigations I, sec.

Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - IF WITI'GENSTEIN COULD TALK, COULD WE UNDERSTAND HIM Perusing the secondary literature on Wittgenstein, I have frequently experienced a perfect Brechtean Entfremdungseffekt. This is interesting, I have felt like saying when reading books and papers on Wittgenstein, but who is the writer talking about Certainly not Ludwig Wittgenstein the actual person who wrote his books and not Elektronisches Buch and whom I happened to meet. Why is there this strange gap between the ideas of the actual philosopher and the musings of his interpreters Wittgenstein is talking to us through the posthumous publication of his writings. Why don't philosophers understand what he is saying A partial reason is outlined in the first essay of this volume. Wittgenstein was far too impatient to explain in his books and book drafts what his problems were, what it was that he was trying to get clear about. He was even too impatient to explain in full his earlier solutions, often merely referring to them casually as it were ina shorthand notation. For one important instance, in The Brown Book, Wittgenstein had explained in some detail what name-object relationships amount to in his view. There he offers both an explanation of what his problem is and an account of his own view illustrated by means of specific examples of language-games. But when he raises the same question again in Philosophical Investigations I, sec.

Paperback. Condición: Brand New. reprint edition. 368 pages. 9.25x6.10x0.79 inches. In Stock.

Hardcover. Condición: Like New. Like New. book.

Hardcover. Condición: new. Hardcover. Frequently, a genuine understanding of a thinker's ideas is possible only by following them further than he did himself. Wittgenstein's Viennese contemporary Karl Kraus spoke in a similar context of one-and-a-half truths in contradistinction to half-truths. In this volume of essays, Jaakko Hintikka examines the two grand visions concerning the interrelations of language, self and the world that guided Wittgenstein's thought at the different stages of his philosophical development. He seeks to show how one of them, the so-called picture theory of language, was in reality a combination of several independent assumptions, while the other, the idea of language-games as the vehicles of meaning, was the end product of an intriguing development. Hintikka asserts that many of Wittgenstein's best-known ideas can, and must, be understood as defences or rationalizations of his overall visions. In several essays, Wittgenstein's ideas are illuminated through comparisons with other philosophers, including Russell, Husserl and Carnap. Wittgenstein was far too impatient to explain in his books and book drafts what his problems were, what it was that he was trying to get clear about. For one important instance, in The Brown Book, Wittgenstein had explained in some detail what name-object relationships amount to in his view. Shipping may be from our Sydney, NSW warehouse or from our UK or US warehouse, depending on stock availability.

Paperback. Condición: Like New. Like New. book.

Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -IF WITI'GENSTEIN COULD TALK, COULD WE UNDERSTAND HIM Perusing the secondary literature on Wittgenstein, I have frequently experienced a perfect Brechtean Entfremdungseffekt. This is interesting, I have felt like saying when reading books and papers on Wittgenstein, but who is the writer talking about Certainly not Ludwig Wittgenstein the actual person who wrote his books and not Elektronisches Buch and whom I happened to meet. Why is there this strange gap between the ideas of the actual philosopher and the musings of his interpreters Wittgenstein is talking to us through the posthumous publication of his writings. Why don't philosophers understand what he is saying A partial reason is outlined in the first essay of this volume. Wittgenstein was far too impatient to explain in his books and book drafts what his problems were, what it was that he was trying to get clear about. He was even too impatient to explain in full his earlier solutions, often merely referring to them casually as it were ina shorthand notation. For one important instance, in The Brown Book, Wittgenstein had explained in some detail what name-object relationships amount to in his view. There he offers both an explanation of what his problem is and an account of his own view illustrated by means of specific examples of language-games. But when he raises the same question again in Philosophical Investigations I, sec. 372 pp. Englisch.

Buch. Condición: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -IF WITI'GENSTEIN COULD TALK, COULD WE UNDERSTAND HIM Perusing the secondary literature on Wittgenstein, I have frequently experienced a perfect Brechtean Entfremdungseffekt. This is interesting, I have felt like saying when reading books and papers on Wittgenstein, but who is the writer talking about Certainly not Ludwig Wittgenstein the actual person who wrote his books and not Elektronisches Buch and whom I happened to meet. Why is there this strange gap between the ideas of the actual philosopher and the musings of his interpreters Wittgenstein is talking to us through the posthumous publication of his writings. Why don't philosophers understand what he is saying A partial reason is outlined in the first essay of this volume. Wittgenstein was far too impatient to explain in his books and book drafts what his problems were, what it was that he was trying to get clear about. He was even too impatient to explain in full his earlier solutions, often merely referring to them casually as it were in a shorthand notation. For one important instance, in The Brown Book, Wittgenstein had explained in some detail what name-object relationships amount to in his view. There he offers both an explanation of what his problem is and an account of his own view illustrated by means of specific examples of language-games. But when he raises the same question again in Philosophical Investigations I, sec. 372 pp. Englisch.

Condición: New. Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. Jaakko Hintikka is the author or co-author of thirty volumes and of some 300 scholarly articles in mathematical and philosophical logic, epistemology, language theory, philosophy of science, history of ideas and history of philosophy, including Ari.

Gebunden. Condición: New. Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. Jaakko Hintikka is the author or co-author of thirty volumes and of some 300 scholarly articles in mathematical and philosophical logic, epistemology, language theory, philosophy of science, history of ideas and history of philosophy, including Ari.

Buch. Condición: Neu. Ludwig Wittgenstein: Half-Truths and One-and-a-Half-Truths | Jaakko Hintikka | Buch | xiv | Englisch | 1996 | Springer Netherland | EAN 9780792340911 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: Springer Verlag GmbH, Tiergartenstr. 17, 69121 Heidelberg, juergen[dot]hartmann[at]springer[dot]com | Anbieter: preigu Print on Demand.

Buch. Condición: Neu. This item is printed on demand - Print on Demand Titel. Neuware -IF WITI'GENSTEIN COULD TALK, COULD WE UNDERSTAND HIM Perusing the secondary literature on Wittgenstein, I have frequently experienced a perfect Brechtean Entfremdungseffekt. This is interesting, I have felt like saying when reading books and papers on Wittgenstein, but who is the writer talking about Certainly not Ludwig Wittgenstein the actual person who wrote his books and not Elektronisches Buch and whom I happened to meet. Why is there this strange gap between the ideas of the actual philosopher and the musings of his interpreters Wittgenstein is talking to us through the posthumous publication of his writings. Why don't philosophers understand what he is saying A partial reason is outlined in the first essay of this volume. Wittgenstein was far too impatient to explain in his books and book drafts what his problems were, what it was that he was trying to get clear about. He was even too impatient to explain in full his earlier solutions, often merely referring to them casually as it were ina shorthand notation. For one important instance, in The Brown Book, Wittgenstein had explained in some detail what name-object relationships amount to in his view. There he offers both an explanation of what his problem is and an account of his own view illustrated by means of specific examples of language-games. But when he raises the same question again in Philosophical Investigations I, sec.Springer Verlag GmbH, Tiergartenstr. 17, 69121 Heidelberg 372 pp. Englisch.

Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. This item is printed on demand - Print on Demand Titel. Neuware -IF WITI'GENSTEIN COULD TALK, COULD WE UNDERSTAND HIM Perusing the secondary literature on Wittgenstein, I have frequently experienced a perfect Brechtean Entfremdungseffekt. This is interesting, I have felt like saying when reading books and papers on Wittgenstein, but who is the writer talking about Certainly not Ludwig Wittgenstein the actual person who wrote his books and not Elektronisches Buch and whom I happened to meet. Why is there this strange gap between the ideas of the actual philosopher and the musings of his interpreters Wittgenstein is talking to us through the posthumous publication of his writings. Why don't philosophers understand what he is saying A partial reason is outlined in the first essay of this volume. Wittgenstein was far too impatient to explain in his books and book drafts what his problems were, what it was that he was trying to get clear about. He was even too impatient to explain in full his earlier solutions, often merely referring to them casually as it were ina shorthand notation. For one important instance, in The Brown Book, Wittgenstein had explained in some detail what name-object relationships amount to in his view. There he offers both an explanation of what his problem is and an account of his own view illustrated by means of specific examples of language-games. But when he raises the same question again in Philosophical Investigations I, sec.Springer Verlag GmbH, Tiergartenstr. 17, 69121 Heidelberg 372 pp. Englisch.