Artículos relacionados a Context Over Foundation: Dewey and Marx: 52 (Sovietica)
Sinopsis
"I should venture to assert that the most pervasive fallacy of philosophic thinking goes back to neglect of context. III John Dewey " . . . philosophers do not grow like mushrooms, out of the earth; they are the outgrowth of their period, their nation, whose most subtle, delicate and invisible juices abound in the philosophical ideas. ,,2 Karl Marx Few issues are more heatedly debated in contemporary philosophy circles than that of con textual ism vs. foundationalism. The genesis for the debate was the publication in 1979 of Richard Rorty's Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, which announ~ed the death of traditional philosophy. By "traditional" here is meant the quest for a certain or apodictic bedrock upon which an overall general theory or schema might be erected. This approach, for Rorty, characterized most previous philosophy, but especially the era from Descartes to Kant. Further, the three major philosophic thinkers of the 20th century, Dewey, Heidegger, and Wittgenstein, each initially tried to construct a foundational philosophy but each of the three, in his later work, broke free of the Kantian conception of philosophy as foundational, and spent his time warning us against those very temptations to which he himself had once succumbed. Thus their later work is therapeutic rather than constructive, edifying rather than systematic, designed to make the reader question his own motives for philosophizing rather than to 3 supply him with a new philosophical program.
"Sinopsis" puede pertenecer a otra edición de este libro.
Reseña del editor
"I should venture to assert that the most pervasive fallacy of philosophic thinking goes back to neglect of context. III John Dewey " . . . philosophers do not grow like mushrooms, out of the earth; they are the outgrowth of their period, their nation, whose most subtle, delicate and invisible juices abound in the philosophical ideas. ,,2 Karl Marx Few issues are more heatedly debated in contemporary philosophy circles than that of con textual ism vs. foundationalism. The genesis for the debate was the publication in 1979 of Richard Rorty's Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, which announ~ed the death of traditional philosophy. By "traditional" here is meant the quest for a certain or apodictic bedrock upon which an overall general theory or schema might be erected. This approach, for Rorty, characterized most previous philosophy, but especially the era from Descartes to Kant. Further, the three major philosophic thinkers of the 20th century, Dewey, Heidegger, and Wittgenstein, each initially tried to construct a foundational philosophy but each of the three, in his later work, broke free of the Kantian conception of philosophy as foundational, and spent his time warning us against those very temptations to which he himself had once succumbed. Thus their later work is therapeutic rather than constructive, edifying rather than systematic, designed to make the reader question his own motives for philosophizing rather than to 3 supply him with a new philosophical program.
"Sobre este título" puede pertenecer a otra edición de este libro.
EUR 185,33
EUR 17,21 gastos de envío desde Estados Unidos de America a España
Destinos, gastos y plazos de envíoComprar nuevo
Ver este artículo
EUR 136,16
EUR 19,49 gastos de envío desde Alemania a España
Destinos, gastos y plazos de envíoOtras ediciones populares con el mismo título
Resultados de la búsqueda para Context Over Foundation: Dewey and Marx: 52 (Sovietica)
Imagen del vendedor
Context Over Foundation
Publicado por
Springer Netherlands, 2012
ISBN 10: 9401078084
ISBN 13: 9789401078085
Nuevo
Tapa blanda
Librería: moluna, Greven, Alemania
Calificación del vendedor: 4 de 5 estrellas
Condición: New. Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. I should venture to assert that the most pervasive fallacy of philosophic thinking goes back to neglect of context. III John Dewey . . . philosophers do not grow like mushrooms, out of the earth they are the outgrowth of their period, their nation, whos. Nº de ref. del artículo: 5834392
Cantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles
Imagen de archivo
Context Over Foundation: Dewey and Marx (Sovietica)
Librería: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Reino Unido
Calificación del vendedor: 5 de 5 estrellas
Condición: New. In. Nº de ref. del artículo: ria9789401078085_new
Cantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles
Imagen del vendedor
Context Over Foundation
Publicado por
Springer, Springer Feb 2012, 2012
ISBN 10: 9401078084
ISBN 13: 9789401078085
Nuevo
Taschenbuch
Librería: BuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K., Bergisch Gladbach, Alemania
Calificación del vendedor: 5 de 5 estrellas
Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -'I should venture to assert that the most pervasive fallacy of philosophic thinking goes back to neglect of context. III John Dewey ' . . . philosophers do not grow like mushrooms, out of the earth; they are the outgrowth of their period, their nation, whose most subtle, delicate and invisible juices abound in the philosophical ideas. ,2 Karl Marx Few issues are more heatedly debated in contemporary philosophy circles than that of con textual ism vs. foundationalism. The genesis for the debate was the publication in 1979 of Richard Rorty's Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, which announ~ed the death of traditional philosophy. By 'traditional' here is meant the quest for a certain or apodictic bedrock upon which an overall general theory or schema might be erected. This approach, for Rorty, characterized most previous philosophy, but especially the era from Descartes to Kant. Further, the three major philosophic thinkers of the 20th century, Dewey, Heidegger, and Wittgenstein, each initially tried to construct a foundational philosophy but each of the three, in his later work, broke free of the Kantian conception of philosophy as foundational, and spent his time warning us against those very temptations to which he himself had once succumbed. Thus their later work is therapeutic rather than constructive, edifying rather than systematic, designed to make the reader question his own motives for philosophizing rather than to 3 supply him with a new philosophical program. 268 pp. Englisch. Nº de ref. del artículo: 9789401078085
Cantidad disponible: 2 disponibles
Imagen del vendedor
Context over Foundation : Dewey and Marx
Librería: GreatBookPrices, Columbia, MD, Estados Unidos de America
Calificación del vendedor: 5 de 5 estrellas
Condición: New. Nº de ref. del artículo: 20193297-n
Cantidad disponible: 15 disponibles
Imagen del vendedor
Context Over Foundation : Dewey and Marx
Publicado por
Springer Netherlands, Springer Netherlands, 2012
ISBN 10: 9401078084
ISBN 13: 9789401078085
Nuevo
Taschenbuch
Librería: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Alemania
Calificación del vendedor: 5 de 5 estrellas
Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - 'I should venture to assert that the most pervasive fallacy of philosophic thinking goes back to neglect of context. III John Dewey ' . . . philosophers do not grow like mushrooms, out of the earth; they are the outgrowth of their period, their nation, whose most subtle, delicate and invisible juices abound in the philosophical ideas. ,2 Karl Marx Few issues are more heatedly debated in contemporary philosophy circles than that of con textual ism vs. foundationalism. The genesis for the debate was the publication in 1979 of Richard Rorty's Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, which announ~ed the death of traditional philosophy. By 'traditional' here is meant the quest for a certain or apodictic bedrock upon which an overall general theory or schema might be erected. This approach, for Rorty, characterized most previous philosophy, but especially the era from Descartes to Kant. Further, the three major philosophic thinkers of the 20th century, Dewey, Heidegger, and Wittgenstein, each initially tried to construct a foundational philosophy but each of the three, in his later work, broke free of the Kantian conception of philosophy as foundational, and spent his time warning us against those very temptations to which he himself had once succumbed. Thus their later work is therapeutic rather than constructive, edifying rather than systematic, designed to make the reader question his own motives for philosophizing rather than to 3 supply him with a new philosophical program. Nº de ref. del artículo: 9789401078085
Cantidad disponible: 1 disponibles
Imagen del vendedor
Context Over Foundation
Publicado por
Springer Netherlands, Springer Netherlands Feb 2012, 2012
ISBN 10: 9401078084
ISBN 13: 9789401078085
Nuevo
Taschenbuch
Librería: buchversandmimpf2000, Emtmannsberg, BAYE, Alemania
Calificación del vendedor: 5 de 5 estrellas
Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. This item is printed on demand - Print on Demand Titel. Neuware -'I should venture to assert that the most pervasive fallacy of philosophic thinking goes back to neglect of context. III John Dewey ' . . . philosophers do not grow like mushrooms, out of the earth; they are the outgrowth of their period, their nation, whose most subtle, delicate and invisible juices abound in the philosophical ideas. ,2 Karl Marx Few issues are more heatedly debated in contemporary philosophy circles than that of con textual ism vs. foundationalism. The genesis for the debate was the publication in 1979 of Richard Rorty's Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, which announ~ed the death of traditional philosophy. By 'traditional' here is meant the quest for a certain or apodictic bedrock upon which an overall general theory or schema might be erected. This approach, for Rorty, characterized most previous philosophy, but especially the era from Descartes to Kant. Further, the three major philosophic thinkers of the 20th century, Dewey, Heidegger, and Wittgenstein, each initially tried to construct a foundational philosophy but each of the three, in his later work, broke free of the Kantian conception of philosophy as foundational, and spent his time warning us against those very temptations to which he himself had once succumbed. Thus their later work is therapeutic rather than constructive, edifying rather than systematic, designed to make the reader question his own motives for philosophizing rather than to 3 supply him with a new philosophical program.Springer Verlag GmbH, Tiergartenstr. 17, 69121 Heidelberg 268 pp. Englisch. Nº de ref. del artículo: 9789401078085
Cantidad disponible: 1 disponibles
Imagen de archivo
Context Over Foundation
Librería: Kennys Bookshop and Art Galleries Ltd., Galway, GY, Irlanda
Calificación del vendedor: 5 de 5 estrellas
Condición: New. Editor(s): Gavin, William J. Series: Sovietica. Num Pages: 259 pages, black & white illustrations. BIC Classification: HPCF; WM. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational. Dimension: 234 x 156 x 14. Weight in Grams: 415. . 2012. Softcover reprint of the original 1st ed. 1988. Paperback. . . . . Nº de ref. del artículo: V9789401078085
Cantidad disponible: 15 disponibles
Imagen de archivo
Context Over Foundation: Dewey and Marx (Sovietica)
Librería: California Books, Miami, FL, Estados Unidos de America
Calificación del vendedor: 5 de 5 estrellas
Condición: New. Nº de ref. del artículo: I-9789401078085
Cantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles
Imagen del vendedor
Context over Foundation : Dewey and Marx
Librería: GreatBookPrices, Columbia, MD, Estados Unidos de America
Calificación del vendedor: 5 de 5 estrellas
Condición: As New. Unread book in perfect condition. Nº de ref. del artículo: 20193297
Cantidad disponible: 15 disponibles
Imagen de archivo
Context Over Foundation (Paperback)
Librería: Grand Eagle Retail, Bensenville, IL, Estados Unidos de America
Calificación del vendedor: 5 de 5 estrellas
Paperback. Condición: new. Paperback. "I should venture to assert that the most pervasive fallacy of philosophic thinking goes back to neglect of context. III John Dewey " . . . philosophers do not grow like mushrooms, out of the earth; they are the outgrowth of their period, their nation, whose most subtle, delicate and invisible juices abound in the philosophical ideas. ,2 Karl Marx Few issues are more heatedly debated in contemporary philosophy circles than that of con textual ism vs. foundationalism. The genesis for the debate was the publication in 1979 of Richard Rorty's Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, which announ~ed the death of traditional philosophy. By "traditional" here is meant the quest for a certain or apodictic bedrock upon which an overall general theory or schema might be erected. This approach, for Rorty, characterized most previous philosophy, but especially the era from Descartes to Kant. Further, the three major philosophic thinkers of the 20th century, Dewey, Heidegger, and Wittgenstein, each initially tried to construct a foundational philosophy but each of the three, in his later work, broke free of the Kantian conception of philosophy as foundational, and spent his time warning us against those very temptations to which he himself had once succumbed. Thus their later work is therapeutic rather than constructive, edifying rather than systematic, designed to make the reader question his own motives for philosophizing rather than to 3 supply him with a new philosophical program. "I should venture to assert that the most pervasive fallacy of philosophic thinking goes back to neglect of context. III John Dewey " . . . philosophers do not grow like mushrooms, out of the earth; they are the outgrowth of their period, their nation, whose most subtle, delicate and invisible juices abound in the philosophical ideas. ,2 Karl Marx Few issues are more heatedly debated in contemporary philosophy circles than that of con textual ism vs. foundationalism. The genesis for the debate was the publication in 1979 of Richard Rorty's Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, which announ~ed the death of traditional philosophy. By "traditional" here is meant the quest for a certain or apodictic bedrock upon which an overall general theory or schema might be erected. This approach, for Rorty, characterized most previous philosophy, but especially the era from Descartes to Kant. Further, the three major philosophic thinkers of the 20th century, Dewey, Heidegger, and Wittgenstein, each initially tried to construct a foundational philosophy but each of the three, in his later work, broke free of the Kantian conception of philosophy as foundational, and spent his time warning us against those very temptations to which he himself had once succumbed. Thus their later work is therapeutic rather than constructive, edifying rather than systematic, designed to make the reader question his own motives for philosophizing rather than to 3 supply him with a new philosophical program. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability. Nº de ref. del artículo: 9789401078085
Cantidad disponible: 1 disponibles