Many scientific disciplines rely on observational data of systems for which it is difficult (or impossible) to implement controlled experiments. Data analysis techniques are required for identifying causal information and relationships directly from such observational data. This need has led to the development of many different time series causality approaches and tools including transfer entropy, convergent cross-mapping (CCM), and Granger causality statistics. A practicing analyst can explore the literature to find many proposals for identifying drivers and causal connections in time series data sets. Exploratory causal analysis (ECA) provides a framework for exploring potential causal structures in time series data sets and is characterized by a myopic goal to determine which data series from a given set of series might be seen as the primary driver. In this work, ECA is used on several synthetic and empirical data sets, and it is found that all of the tested time series causality tools agree with each other (and intuitive notions of causality) for many simple systems but can provide conflicting causal inferences for more complicated systems. It is proposed that such disagreements between different time series causality tools during ECA might provide deeper insight into the data than could be found otherwise.
"Sinopsis" puede pertenecer a otra edición de este libro.
James McCracken received his B.S. in Physics and B.S. in Astrophysics from the Florida Institute of Technology in 2004, his M.S. from the University of Central Florida in 2006, and his Ph.D. in Physics from George Mason University in 2015. He currently lives and works in the Washington, D.C., metro area.
"Sobre este título" puede pertenecer a otra edición de este libro.
EUR 2,25 gastos de envío en Estados Unidos de America
Destinos, gastos y plazos de envíoEUR 3,40 gastos de envío en Estados Unidos de America
Destinos, gastos y plazos de envíoLibrería: Lucky's Textbooks, Dallas, TX, Estados Unidos de America
Condición: New. Nº de ref. del artículo: ABLIING23Mar3113020034965
Cantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles
Librería: GreatBookPrices, Columbia, MD, Estados Unidos de America
Condición: New. Nº de ref. del artículo: 44571012-n
Cantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles
Librería: Grand Eagle Retail, Mason, OH, Estados Unidos de America
Paperback. Condición: new. Paperback. Many scientific disciplines rely on observational data of systems for which it is difficult (or impossible) to implement controlled experiments. Data analysis techniques are required for identifying causal information and relationships directly from such observational data. This need has led to the development of many different time series causality approaches and tools including transfer entropy, convergent cross-mapping (CCM), and Granger causality statistics. A practicing analyst can explore the literature to find many proposals for identifying drivers and causal connections in time series data sets. Exploratory causal analysis (ECA) provides a framework for exploring potential causal structures in time series data sets and is characterized by a myopic goal to determine which data series from a given set of series might be seen as the primary driver. In this work, ECA is used on several synthetic and empirical data sets, and it is found that all of the tested time series causality tools agree with each other (and intuitive notions of causality) for many simple systems but can provide conflicting causal inferences for more complicated systems. It is proposed that such disagreements between different time series causality tools during ECA might provide deeper insight into the data than could be found otherwise. Exploratory causal analysis (ECA) provides a framework for exploring potential causal structures in time series data sets and is characterized by a myopic goal to determine which data series from a given set of series might be seen as the primary driver. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability. Nº de ref. del artículo: 9783031007811
Cantidad disponible: 1 disponibles
Librería: Best Price, Torrance, CA, Estados Unidos de America
Condición: New. SUPER FAST SHIPPING. Nº de ref. del artículo: 9783031007811
Cantidad disponible: 2 disponibles
Librería: GreatBookPrices, Columbia, MD, Estados Unidos de America
Condición: As New. Unread book in perfect condition. Nº de ref. del artículo: 44571012
Cantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles
Librería: Books Puddle, New York, NY, Estados Unidos de America
Condición: New. 1st edition NO-PA16APR2015-KAP. Nº de ref. del artículo: 26395061297
Cantidad disponible: 4 disponibles
Librería: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Reino Unido
Condición: New. In. Nº de ref. del artículo: ria9783031007811_new
Cantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles
Librería: Majestic Books, Hounslow, Reino Unido
Condición: New. Print on Demand. Nº de ref. del artículo: 402364398
Cantidad disponible: 4 disponibles
Librería: BuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K., Bergisch Gladbach, Alemania
Taschenbuch. Condición: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -Many scientific disciplines rely on observational data of systems for which it is difficult (or impossible) to implement controlled experiments. Data analysis techniques are required for identifying causal information and relationships directly from such observational data. This need has led to the development of many different time series causality approaches and tools including transfer entropy, convergent cross-mapping (CCM), and Granger causality statistics. A practicing analyst can explore the literature to find many proposals for identifying drivers and causal connections in time series data sets. Exploratory causal analysis (ECA) provides a framework for exploring potential causal structures in time series data sets and is characterized by a myopic goal to determine which data series from a given set of series might be seen as the primary driver. In this work, ECA is used on several synthetic and empirical data sets, and it is found that all of the tested time series causality tools agree with each other (and intuitive notions of causality) for many simple systems but can provide conflicting causal inferences for more complicated systems. It is proposed that such disagreements between different time series causality tools during ECA might provide deeper insight into the data than could be found otherwise. 148 pp. Englisch. Nº de ref. del artículo: 9783031007811
Cantidad disponible: 2 disponibles
Librería: GreatBookPricesUK, Woodford Green, Reino Unido
Condición: New. Nº de ref. del artículo: 44571012-n
Cantidad disponible: Más de 20 disponibles