History and Power in Colonial India
"Sinopsis" puede pertenecer a otra edición de este libro.
Ranajit Guha is, arguably, the most creative Indian historian of this century. His works have deeply influenced not only the writing of subcontinental history, but also historical investigations elsewhere, as well as cultural studies, literary theories, and social analyses across the world. -- Amartya Sen Aside from its obvious relevance to Indian history, Guha's book is a brilliant example of revolutionary historical method, new perspectives on nationalist history, and theoretical inventiveness in the procedures of historical research. -- Edward W. Said Over the years, the result of this endeavor has been the production of an eclectic brand of ideological theories, an incisive critique of the existing Indian historiography, and a renewed theoretical fervor, as this book itself epitomizes, for retrieving the history of the "subaltern" past - their revolutionary political moments and cultural class consciousness. -- Amalendu K. Chakraborty Journal of World HistoryReseña del editor:
What is colonialism and what is a colonial state? Ranajit Guha points out that the colonial state in South Asia was fundamentally different from the metropolitan bourgeois state which sired it. The metropolitan state was hegemonic in character, and its claim to dominance was based on a power relation in which persuasion outweighed coercion. Conversely, the colonial state was non-hegemonic, and in its structure of dominance coercion was paramount. Indeed, the originality of the South Asian colonial state lay precisely in this difference: a historical paradox, it was an autocracy set up and sustained in the East by the foremost democracy of the Western world. It was not possible for that non-hegemonic state to assimilate the civil society of the colonized to itself. Thus the colonial state, as Guha defines it in this work, was a paradox,a dominance without hegemony. Dominance without hegemony had a nationalist aspect as well. This arose from a structural split between the elite and subaltern domains of politics, and the consequent failure of the Indian bourgeoisie to integrate vast areas of the life and consciousness of the people into an alternative hegemony. That predicament is discussed in terms of the nationalist project of anticipating power by mobilizing the masses and producing an alternative historiography. In both endeavours the elite claimed to speak for the people constituted as a nation and sought to challenge the pretensions of an alien regime to represent the colonized. A rivalry between an aspirant to power and its incumbent, this was in essence a contest for hegemony.
"Sobre este título" puede pertenecer a otra edición de este libro.
Descripción Harvard Univ Press. Estado de conservación: BRAND NEW. BRAND NEW Softcover A Brand New Quality Book from a Full-Time Bookshop in business since 1992!. Nº de ref. de la librería 2363002
Descripción Harvard University Press. Estado de conservación: New. Brand New. Nº de ref. de la librería 0674214838
Descripción Harvard University Press, 1998. Paperback. Estado de conservación: New. book. Nº de ref. de la librería 0674214838
Descripción Harvard University Press, 1998. Paperback. Estado de conservación: New. Nº de ref. de la librería DADAX0674214838
Descripción Harvard Univ Pr, 1998. Paperback. Estado de conservación: Brand New. 245 pages. 9.25x6.00x0.75 inches. In Stock. Nº de ref. de la librería 0674214838
Descripción Harvard University Press, 1998. Paperback. Estado de conservación: New. Nº de ref. de la librería P110674214838
Descripción Harvard University Press. PAPERBACK. Estado de conservación: New. 0674214838 New Condition. Nº de ref. de la librería NEW6.0335648