The Peacemaker's Paradox: Pursuing Justice in the Shadow of Conflict - Tapa dura

Praise for The Peacemaker's Paradox

Finding a peaceful end to a bitter, deeply-rooted conflict can seem an impossible mission. Addressing the painful crimes of a conflict makes this even more difficult. As Priscilla Hayner makes clear, every society must follow its own path, but this eminently honest and thought-provoking work should greatly help mediators to work through this set of very real, and very difficult, dilemmas.

George J. Mitchell, Former U.S. Senate Majority Leader, Special Envoy for Northern Ireland, and Special Envoy for Middle East Peace

The Peacemaker’s Paradox illustrates the dilemma faced by the human rights community during peace negotiations, both in finding a place at the table and ensuring accountability for human rights violations. Those undertaking peace talks often argue that peace should come before justice. The many case studies in this book, from Sierra Leone to Colombia, not only confront this notion, but also challenge human rights advocates to recognize the difficulties in negotiating justice and protecting the rights of victims. The final chapter on the Colombian peace process in particular offers hope, showing the importance of including victims and civil society in these discussions.

Yasmin Sooka, Former Commissioner of the South African and Sierra Leonean Truth Commissions

Priscilla Hayner’s The Peacemaker’s Paradox addresses the delicate balance between peace and justice through a rigorous examination of the inherent tensions and external factors that impact peacemaking. Her focus on lived experiences and the need for strategic vision makes it an insightful work and an invaluable tool for all those pursuing peace and justice.

Kofi Annan, Seventh Secretary-General of the United Nations and Nobel Peace Prize Laureate

The Peacemaker’s Paradox is beyond excellent – rich with insight and solid advice for anyone involved in peace negotiations. Hayner’s formidable experience – combined with her clinical approach in dissecting past peace agreements and her thorough attention to the arguments posed by the stakeholders involved in peace negotiations – explains how (and why) she has succeeded in writing what is effectively a peacemaker’s guidebook.

Michael G. Karnavas, International Criminal Law Blog

What emerges from Hayner’s predominantly empirical work is a crucial theoretical lesson: No two conflicts of world politics are completely alike, and each attempt to tackle a crisis requires a tailor-made approach that pays heed to the individual character of the respective conflict. While Hayner arrives at this insight through a discussion of the peace vs justice dilemma, this lesson is equally relevant in the context of R2P or the Just War Tradition.

Christof Royer,  Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding

Expanding from her path-breaking work in Unspeakable Truths, Priscilla Hayner focuses on a new challenge in The Peacemaker’s Paradox: the age-old problem of negotiating peace after a war of atrocities. Drawing on her first-hand involvement in peace processes and interviews from the frontlines of peace talks, the author recounts many heretofore-untold stories of how justice has been negotiated, with great difficulty, and what this tells us for the future. Those with the most power to stop a war are the least likely to submit to justice for their crimes, but the demand for justice only grows louder. She also asks how the intervention of an international tribunal, such as the International Criminal Court, changes how a war is fought and the possibility of brokering peace. The Peacemaker’s Paradox looks far and wide, from Gaddafi’s Libya to the FARC talks in Colombia, to provide an unparalleled exploration of these thorniest of issues.

A combination of interview-based reporting and political analysis, The Peacemaker’s Paradox brings clarity to a field fraught with both legal and practical difficulties.