"Sinopsis" puede pertenecer a otra edición de este libro.
"Sobre este título" puede pertenecer a otra edición de este libro.
Gastos de envío:
EUR 11,62
De Reino Unido a Estados Unidos de America
Descripción Condición: New. PRINT ON DEMAND Book; New; Fast Shipping from the UK. No. book. Nº de ref. del artículo: ria9780199263882_lsuk
Descripción HRD. Condición: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000. Nº de ref. del artículo: L1-9780199263882
Descripción Condición: New. New. In shrink wrap. Looks like an interesting title! 1.94. Nº de ref. del artículo: Q-0199263884
Descripción HRD. Condición: New. New Book. Delivered from our UK warehouse in 4 to 14 business days. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000. Nº de ref. del artículo: L1-9780199263882
Descripción Hardcover. Condición: new. Hardcover. In some languages every statement must contain a specification of the type of evidence on which it is based: for example, whether the speaker saw it, or heard it, or inferred it from indirect evidence, or learnt it from someone else. This grammatical reference to information source is called 'evidentiality', and is one of the least described grammatical categories. Evidentiality systems differ in how complex they are: some distinguish just two terms (eyewitness andnoneyewitness, or reported and everything else), while others have six or even more terms. Evidentiality is a category in its own right, and not a subcategory of epistemic or some other modality, norof tense-aspect. Every language has some way of referring to the source of information, but not every language has grammatical evidentiality. In English expressions such as I guess, they say, I hear that, the alleged are not obligatory and do not constitute a grammatical system. Similar expressions in other languages may provide historical sources for evidentials. True evidentials, by contrast, form a grammatical system. In the North Arawak language Tariana an expressionsuch as "the dog bit the man" must be augmented by a grammatical suffix indicating whether the event was seen, or heard, or assumed, or reported.This book provides the firstexhaustive cross-linguistic typological study of how languages deal with the marking of information source. Examples are drawn from over 500 languages from all over the world, several of them based on the author's original fieldwork. Professor Aikhenvald also considers the role evidentiality plays in human cognition, and the ways in which evidentiality influences human perception of the world. This is an important book on an intriguing subject. It will interest anthropologists, cognitivepsychologists and philosophers, as well as linguists. The book investigates a variety of grammatical categories related to evidentiality within language, such as aspect and person. It also discusses the cognitive and sociolinguistic consequences of evidentiality in a language. Shipping may be from our Sydney, NSW warehouse or from our UK or US warehouse, depending on stock availability. Nº de ref. del artículo: 9780199263882
Descripción Condición: New. Nº de ref. del artículo: ABLIING23Feb2215580050581
Descripción Hardcover. Condición: new. Hardcover. In some languages every statement must contain a specification of the type of evidence on which it is based: for example, whether the speaker saw it, or heard it, or inferred it from indirect evidence, or learnt it from someone else. This grammatical reference to information source is called 'evidentiality', and is one of the least described grammatical categories. Evidentiality systems differ in how complex they are: some distinguish just two terms (eyewitness andnoneyewitness, or reported and everything else), while others have six or even more terms. Evidentiality is a category in its own right, and not a subcategory of epistemic or some other modality, norof tense-aspect. Every language has some way of referring to the source of information, but not every language has grammatical evidentiality. In English expressions such as I guess, they say, I hear that, the alleged are not obligatory and do not constitute a grammatical system. Similar expressions in other languages may provide historical sources for evidentials. True evidentials, by contrast, form a grammatical system. In the North Arawak language Tariana an expressionsuch as "the dog bit the man" must be augmented by a grammatical suffix indicating whether the event was seen, or heard, or assumed, or reported.This book provides the firstexhaustive cross-linguistic typological study of how languages deal with the marking of information source. Examples are drawn from over 500 languages from all over the world, several of them based on the author's original fieldwork. Professor Aikhenvald also considers the role evidentiality plays in human cognition, and the ways in which evidentiality influences human perception of the world. This is an important book on an intriguing subject. It will interest anthropologists, cognitivepsychologists and philosophers, as well as linguists. The book investigates a variety of grammatical categories related to evidentiality within language, such as aspect and person. It also discusses the cognitive and sociolinguistic consequences of evidentiality in a language. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability. Nº de ref. del artículo: 9780199263882
Descripción Condición: New. Book is in NEW condition. Nº de ref. del artículo: 0199263884-2-1